"by whom"?
By our governments. It seems like they all are heading in the same direction: More internet control, more observation and registration, more traffic tracking, more financial control, more privacy invasions, etc. etc.
The big corporations are everywhere busy to lure our governments in colluding with them in order to control the population and to force us to buy their products. Through patenting (Monsanto et. al.) or through legislation (compulsory vaccinations, health insurance) or through harassment and out-legislation of the small producers, and especially the organic ones (fresh milk anyone?).
In short: fascist tyranny.

Yeah, for me the warning bells signalled back in tum-te-tum-oh-one when they ... invaded Irak based on a non-sense presentation in the UN.

'The right direction'...
That would be
1. Keep Guantanamo open
2. More debt
3. Introduce and expand extrajudicial killings by drones
4. More war
5. More TSA
6. More DHS
7. More evil
and on, and on, and on...

Is this your 'right direction'?

Anyway, thanks for trying to bring the discussion back to the totally useless Dem-Rep-debate.
Speaking of idiots...

I see. So that's the reason why they only ask some questions.
As in: "We've got credible information about pending terrorist attacks, but let's not upset the people too much with scanners.
Let's keep that for later, when they are more used to our appearance in the public.
In the mean time, let's just wait for 'the terrorists' to succeed.

Yeah right, as if that is adding to security.

Actually, 'TSA' stands for:
The SA...

If it's coming from you, then you know where you can stick it :)

I'm afraid this time it will be a worldwide co-ordinated fascist attack on all our freedoms.

Geez, what a 'friends' one can make on facebook.com.
Not my venue...

Which not necessarily means that he got it right this time.

The tests that I have seen, say that GMO in the long run is detrimental to our health.

... and what exactly does this have to do with GMO?
And how many lives did his technology cost in terms of diseases through the soil exhaustion, hence reduced nutrient content in food?

... are more the result of the introduction of hybrid vs. the native varieties.
The fact that the big agricultural corporations preferred to introduce GMO hybrids, more than non-GMO hybrids, and push them relentlessly through bribery, does not make the increased production a result of GMO 'an sich'.

As long as there is no conclusive science telling us where all the 'modern' diseases (cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes) are coming from, to me the correlation with the introduction of processed and chemically grown, and even GMO, foods is too strong to state that the choice to fear GMO's (and processed food) is 'superstitious'.

That's why my opinion is that everyone has the right to choose for 'organic' food, and to demand also labeling of the same.

That's a lot of unproven statements in 3 sentences...

Why, is 'defending' China 'unpatriotic'?