Schools are largely funded at local levels. The parent is just wrong. What happened was the departmd.t of education was created.

They don't neccesarily need to thin the herd. Training and motivating them so the present a usable product is another option.

If these problem teacher don't get with it, the should be expelled from the union.

Hmm. I thought it was a porno. Guess we know where you mind has been.

A business license from whom? Not everyplace requires a business license to have a business.

Good. Limit .org to US only.

Really? The local community college has a .edu name. As I recall, phoenix.edu too.

It is a shame that you didn't read the second link you included. It is rather specific in saying:

Given Comcast's long running fight with Level 3 about peering agreements, and the fact that Level 3 is also a Netflix CDN provider, I believe that Comcast is refusing to pay for the amount of bandwidth needed to handle the amount of Netflix data its customers are streaming from Level 3 CDN nodes.

That's the choke point problem, NOT Comcast deliberately throttling Netflix. As for proof:

Unfortunately, there's really no way of me proving this theory.

At that point the entire proof boils down to "motive" and guessing. And if the peering connection is the bottleneck, then yes, it does impact all traffic crossing that connection, not just Netflix.

Yeah, 'cause we all know that Level 3 has no dog in the fight and no public relations issues to deal with over the problem. They'd never lie.

And it is the same governments that take that property and turn it into rights of way. One hand giveth, the other taketh away.

However, you can lay in another fiber.

No, that's not necessarily true. If the Netflix data has to pass through a choke point to another network provider and is slowed down because of all the other traffic also passing that point, and the ISP's streaming service is contained entirely on the ISP's net, then it isn't a configuration issue, it's an amount of bandwidth available issue.

And since many people confuse the On Demand kind of streaming service from Comcast with the purely internet based services, then you need to remember that On Demand doesn't use the Internet, it uses cable bandwidth.

As opposed to the last 100 years of utopia and global cooperation we have enjoyed.

Unless you're not allowed to, in which case, this device is the difference between living in Hell for six months and living in relative contentedness for six months.

Salt water under high pressure is not corrosive? You've never dealt with stuff underwater for very long, have you?

Which is what I'd call a corrosive environment.

The comment was about finding the backdoors and such, not just being able to flash in a binary from someone else you have to trust hasn't put one in. You don't find anything when you flash in someone else's binary, you just add another level of trust. (As someone else already pointed out -- is there code hardwired into the router that isn't replaced by any flashing?)

If you want to find the malicious code, yeah, you need to know what was in it.

The Federal Income Tax Code isn't Oklahoma's Income Tax Code, and the tax being talked about is a state tax.

FTFY. Just like every other parasitic prick on the planet. I bet you don't pay more than you are required to, do you? Am I a "parasitic prick" because I gave a thousand bucks to the Red Cross last year so I would owe less in federal taxes? I'd rather see RC get the money than the feds and I'm a bad person?

And the content can never be Amazoned ... I mean deleted by the copyright holder.

I actually thought the same thing, but according to the article, these aren't full of manuals. They've got 300 popular books and literary classics. It's a lightweight, standardized, secure library for sailors who are bored and want to read. While this would be a terrible consumer device, I think it makes sense for the use case. If you're deployed on a ship for six months, having 300 books to choose from is a lot better than having zero books to choose from.

Interesting. And you said that as AC because you believe it so strongly?

BTW, i didn't say it. Others did. I gave opinion on it and opinions are never lies. You should take your gripe up with the people who wrote the standards. You can use your google finger and find the standards on the PBS website.

The reason you will not refute anything is because you cannot. Its the same reason you posted AC, you know you cannot refute anything so you don't want your post associated with your on line identity.