Old being the new new has already gotten old. Old is the new old, new is the new new.

This article is fake.
All children of all ages browser the internet supervised and monitored by the NSA!

Some ISPs. Others charge for email hosting and SMTP services.

Fine? How do you send emails with a blocked port 25? Some server don't support TLS, so you can't use 587, you need to stick to plain-text/port 25.

To call this backwards compatibility, there bluetooth would need to have been replaced by something else as a headset standard. It hasn't. It's the latest thing there is, and Sony does not support it.
WIRED headsets is backwards compatibility. Who even uses wired headsets in the living room!?

Neither is incompetence no behalf of the registrar.

For some games. On strategy games, we usually use 20+ keybord shortcuts AND the mouse. There's no way to map that many buttons to that gamepad, and that IS an issue.

These internships aren't payed, big difference.

A day or two, I agree. This isn't a day or two, and they're not rotating every job in the factory for a short while. They're sitting down for a few months in a single spot of the assembly line.

It sure looks like this website was made back in 2004. I'm guessing that the time travel was expensive.
I also wonder why the used images for text, which has been SO critized for... the last decade?

At a first glance, I think someone slipped about 5 zeroes too many on that price tag.

Because I just downloaded the lastest snapshot of X and want to build it. I only care about every specific line if something breaks (to report it). I probably won't understand most of what it's doing anyway.

I live in south america and haven't heard a word about it being out of beta. Where ARE they marketing it?

It's funny, but it seems their development model isn't really open source, they just plan to release the source when they're done.
Mind you, I'm not saying they're lying. They never stated their development model was open source.

What's the big difference?
An open source development model means the source is open from day 0, both for contributions, testing, etc, etc, etc.
This is actually a closed development (ie: behind closed doors), which later gets published.
The quality of the end result of both development models varies greatly.

Interesting. Those prices are way higher than in Argentina, though free decent internet is rare. Free internet is usually is no more than 2 or 3 KB/s tops.
Anyway, I expected Australia to be better of than us, communications-wise.

I don't think that's the actual goal. The goal is to maintain Ozone-* as middleware between chromium and *, so they don't need to rewrite each feature for X11, Wayland, Mir, etc.
In truth, since development times SHOULD shrink, this may free up devs to work on other features that make the browser run faster - or not.