You got to the voter rolls, and nail everyone for, say, $500 for failure to participate. Much better mandate than that rotten Afford Care Act.

That is absolutely not a conservative viewpoint. I can grant you that there is a minority that wants to make abortion completely illegal; I'd settle for just not getting mugged to pay for murders. Also, only the most extreme libertarians would argue for zero (0) taxes. The common thought is that the enumerated powers of the Constitution make sense, and should be funded. Mandating gun ownership, while bandied about, is about as un-conservative as mandating health insurance.
In all, you proffer a mostly distorted view of conservativism. Come on down to http://www.cpac.org/ and try some enlightenment for a change. It would help you a lot, I think. Can I sponsor a ticket for you?

OK

I'm really, really bored with your series of slanders of both me and other decent Americans. Cut that out.

The debate between R's & D's is not "Should we get our Thelma & Louise on?", but, rather, who gets to drive.

Just own the fact that the cancer is more Progressive than it is partisan. The two-party gag is merely a ruse.

Well, yes they are. Your local putzes cannot inflate the currency, and beggar the unborn.

If you paid a penalty for not voting, that would affect behavior quite a bit. Hmmm.

Lord have mercy on you for slandering good Americans.

Mostly

Why do you H8 the government?

It won't happen without significant pressure from the voters, which, I concede, is difficult to gather.

The shame is that a country founded to overthrow the boot of aristocracy has fallen prey to a "permanent political class", and a line of "Progressive" hooey that has turned the country into a vast plantation through debt, bread & circuses (entitlements).
Then there is the parade of pseudo-intellectual twerps in the Information Age who, like some vast, demented electronic warfare system, seem bent on crapflooding all dissenting voices into silence.
You're the best.

I think that, as decades unfold, humans are going to walk back the "technology everywhere" thing. For legal reasons, chiefly.

No hyperbole there.

In my perfect future America, there would be a GPLv3 mapping algorithm that calculated all of the districts. You tell me how many parameters. But let the code and (read-only) data be free, and let the bun-fight move to how the data get collected and validated.
Screw these political parties. To the wall. With a large drill. And some jello on top.

Not if the election is conducted properly.