All I can say is that it's good for your livelihood that you're not in a position to make such calls.

I've never heard of it until you told me about it. Had to look it up on wikipedia.

Of course, I haven't owned a TV in over 1/3 of my life, so I'm probably not the one to judge movie popularity.

Tools > Options

In general tab "home page" should be set to "about:blank" (without quote marks).
In tabs tab, "when opening a new tab show" option should be set to "blank page".

Then get pale moon. It's basically FF's new features but without the fucked up UI. It still has all those things you mentioned. And they are actually improved on, like the status bar is significantly more customizable.

It's not trivial for those locked into the browser because of add-on functionality not available elsewhere.

Luckily however, there are people who forked FF while still getting the security updates and such.

Besides my new tab is about:blank.

I assume you meant "engage". Which would suggest that you simply do not understand how modern civil aviation works.

To point out the absurdity of your claim. No other reason. If you are annoyed when the obvious absurdity of your comment is pointed out to you, perhaps you should not make absurd public statements?

Do you even understand that slashdot shows the source of your link next to your link? You've gone to openly lying now.

The problem is that these are green lasers (very powerful) that cause severe blinding of the pilots in terminal landing phase.

Wikipedia page on the topic is fairly informative:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Generally green. But that won't help the problem, because the biggest issue is the blinding flashes in the wind shield during landing. Glasses won't help you there.

At this point, the episodes of blindness can be controlled though the fact that commercial airliners have a pilot and co-pilot. If one is blinded, the other takes controls. Civil aviation has an extreme hard on for avoiding single points of failure, to the point of forbidding pilots from eating the same item from in-flight menu as to avoid potential of food poisoning taking both pilots out of commission. Then there's the autopilot system on top of it. So no crashes that we know of at this point in time, just some close calls.

The same hard on for safety however dictates that something should be done about the problem. And as someone who would like to keep his eyes healthy for as long as possible, I happen to agree, as those laser pointers are equally present in drunken parties.

I agree. Specifically we should have a detailed dissemination of the grandest reading of them all: Cthulhu Mythos.

It should be taught to kids as soon as they learn to read.

The article is about removing natural selection from the books. We can observe natural selection happening in a matter of days with some bacteria in a petri dish - it's an extremely well established scientific theory. We know it happens.

In fact, here's a nice picture:

http://www.gocomics.com/doones...

When the other idea is based on "I have an imaginary friend who told me he wrote a book that said so", I dare say that teaching that as science is about the same as teaching cthulhu mythos as science.

You have presented an unlikely argument, and backed it by linking to organisation with known penchant for outright lying and falsification of facts to the point of going to the court of law to uphold it's right to lie and falsificate facts.

The fact that you chose to pick your source from this organisation serves as a detriment to your argument, not a benefit as you seem to have implied.

I suggest finding a source with much better obfuscated agenda and that is better at lying.

Which was my point. Most people who fall under the definition would in fact do the very thing you seem to claim they wouldn't. If given a task of using all means to discredit the single person, examining his entire life, including that of his close family looking for potential dirt is what "responsible adult" would do.