Comment Re:VIDEO tag? (Score 1) 325
IIRC, Opera was actually the first browser to release a (alpha?) version of their browser that supported <video>.
For whatever reason they haven't released one since.
IIRC, Opera was actually the first browser to release a (alpha?) version of their browser that supported <video>.
For whatever reason they haven't released one since.
That was Beethoven, and for only part of his life.
Could you at least check facts you're not sure of?
Ah, the classic "I'm special, why are you so blind?" retort. Keep patting yourself on the back.
And I do understand why it's forbidden.
But you're special and won't screw up, right?
It's amazing the rationalizations that people go through. Stop coming up with excuses and pay attention to the road.
You're not special, and you're threatening people's lives with your selfish stupidity.
Talking at all on a cell-phone is a bad idea; studies have found it's similar to DUI. Knock yourself out: http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&q=cell+phone+driving+accident
Talking on a phone is equivalent to DUI: http://hfs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/2/381
It doesn't matter if you're using a hand-held or hands-free phone: http://hfs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/1/196
In other words, the danger lies in your concentration not being on the road. If you're writing text, you're not concentrating on the road. Therefore I'd be surprised if texting didn't have similar risks.
Please, do the right thing. It won't kill you to wait till you're at a destination to text. It might if you do (and others, unfortunately).
What decade do you live in, man? The 1980s?
http://www.xfree86.org/current/mit-shm.html
Also, I used to use X on a 486/66 with 16MB RAM -- and it worked comparable to Win95, which was quite good. My mp3 player has far more juice and memory than that machine did, let alone a netbook.
Please don't take about things you don't know about as if you do.
But I also believe in freedom of choice.
I don't. There are a lot of infectious diseases near where I live.
It's amazing how many people think that health care is an individual exercise. Tell that to an infectious agent.
Eight hour waiting lines?
This is big news to me. Maybe I'm not living in the same Canada you're hearing about.
"
Of course, it's not necessary to use a functional programming language to use these techniques. Because ideas from the functional programming world are appearing in mainstream languages, it is more important than ever to understand these techniques. Tom Christiansen said it best:
A programmer who hasn't been exposed to all four of the imperative, functional, objective, and logical programming styles has one or more conceptual blindspots. It's like knowing how to boil but not fry. Programming is not a skill one develops in five easy lessons.
Many programming languages offer a mixture of styles. Most object oriented languages have an imperative core, where classes, objects and methods provide a thin veneer over a language that is little more than a slightly improved version of C. Many functional programming languages mix functional, imperative, and object-oriented styles together in a manner that makes it difficult to tell them apart.
Haskell, on the other hand, is a purely functional language that restricts itself to the functional style of programming. Learning and using Haskell makes it easy to see the power and benefits of lambda calculus and functional programming.
On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.