Why do we still even need ethernet? How often do you need something other than IPv4/6 which could be done as its own layer since no one uses a bus topology anymore (did that ever get faster than a total shared 10 megabit capacity?).
Not to mention all the people who will use whatever technology they come up with, at higher transmit powers, to kill cell phones everywhere (although in a movie theater, this might be a good thing). If the system requires authentication to work, no one will do it. If it's a coded signal, they better find a way to avoid a replay attack.
This is clearly intended to help drivers avoid having to open those big folding maps that the NHTSA has never even attempted to control or ban, like they should.
... that should be quite a bad smell.
The researchers have contacted Apple about their exploit but haven't heard back from the company and aren't sharing more details of their hack until they do.
With this attitude, don't expect Apple to ever contact them.
The researchers have contacted Apple about their exploit but haven't heard back from the company and aren't sharing more details of their hack until they do.
Well, that seems to be simple
Tie it in with a dedicated phone system so it can be sending the pictures back to the police headquarters continuously.
Then we'll see "self pix" like remote TV reporting. No need for a camera person to tag along and no need for a remote van with that tall transmitter tower that can get mixed up with the electrical wires overhead.
What can this do to help us extend the length of fiber optics, or lower the transmitter power on long runs like overseas?
There's only ONE exactly like that, but the network allocation of 2001:0db8 has 79,228,162,514,264,337,593,543,950,333 of them (not counting a few needed to manage the space). Too bad it's all reserved, so not even you can have one like that.
... because all the porn, music, movie, and warez sites are moving to IPv6 to hide.
Someone doesn't understand what NAT does. The T part means translation. It's not needed in IPv6 anymore, but can be used for obfuscation. The NAT box keeps track of the translation so that traffic handles won't know where the real origin is. With a limited address space like you get in IPv4, which is usually just ONE address, then NAT translates everything to that address. With IPv6 NAT can translate the internal network structure into random IPv6 addresses in the standard
Because it is known that tornado winds can reach at least 320 MPH.
I hate coders like you: I have to jump all over the place to see what's happening in some function you call that isn't located right where the call is located. So now I end having to use 3 monitors and a couple dozen windows just to see all the logic of what is happening.
Too Big; Don't Buy. Well, unless you want it that big.
I'd be quite happy with 2304x1296. It just need to be a little taller than 1200 (1080 would never work out). I have 1920x1200 now and it's just a wee bit too small. It seems my only option is 2560x1600.
I also need the right spectrum. The monitors we bought from Dell at work really sucked because of the wavelengths chosen for each of the primary colors. They split wide apart. Nobody specs that, so there is no way to tell when buying online. I'm currently using an NEC MultiSync EA241WM. I had that at work, so I bought one for home, too. It has the spectrum that works best for me (colors don't split apart in my glasses).
Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.
