Comment Re:Fucking hypocrites (Score 1) 238
Yeah, because that would be doable in a finite amount of time.
Yeah, because that would be doable in a finite amount of time.
Current nukes, yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon
And how does switching from one form of fossil fuel to a different one help, exactly?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster#Death_toll
Well, 64% of those on board survived, yeah, which just makes it a somewhat inefficient way to kill people.
Plus, y'know, the Hindenburg had about a hojillion times as much hydrogen in it as you would ever fit in a car...
After reading the article (WTF, right?), I was somewhat amused by the shock and dismay he displayed that some random person could have accessed all his files (including tax and medical records in a different account). . . . Dude, it's the Cloud.
Sounds like a good theory to allow time travel, too!
He's not saying there's a set number of states. A state is just a snapshot, for the purposes of this conversation one noticeably different from the other.
Why would he put em-dashes there in the first place?
If the password policies* of J Random Bank is any indication, I assume that the only way most banks are secure is out of sheer luck, not competence.
*At least one lowercase, uppercase, number, and symbol...but limited to a max of 8-16 characters. WTF
By that argument, and the transitive property, source code is the same as the binary as well because the compiled binary is a series of numbers that can be read as commands. (They're gradations of the same thing; no two of the three is "the same".)
Mentioning JavaScript and "ASM" (presumably not standing for assembly) in the same sentence makes me throw up a little in my mouth.
...Hence why they're talking about adding DRM to HTML5.
Yeah, by then they'll probably be on Chrome 94.
Lesser. 'Lessor' refers to someone who leases something to another.
Scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, Man.