Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment Impedance matching (Score 1) 608

It is about more than just having the correct number of wires. You have to look at the impedance of the lines. One company was able to do a demo with 100baseT over barbed wire seperated by several inches of air, but only because that width of free space matches the impedance of cat5 UTP.

Unfortunatly Cat5 is 100ohm and RG6 is 75ohm. Every incidance of impedance mismatch causes a reflection. Going from 100ohm to 75ohm gives a negative reflection, and the reverse causes a positive one. Realy short mismatches (like a conector) largely cancel out but long cable runs...

The short answer is that for a reliable high bandwidth solution you are probably better off ignoring the coax. 802.11n should give you all the wireless bandwidth you need, g tends to have a real throughput of around 20Mb but n claims 100Mb (DVD rate about 5Mbps, broadcast DTV up to 19.4Mbps, BlueRay up to 40Mbps). Or you could future proof yourself and run Cat5e, works with Gigabit ethernet.

And yes, IAAEE (I Am An Electrical Engineer)

Comment Steamboat Willie Event Horizon (Score 5, Interesting) 331

Mickey Mouse will never enter the public domain. Disney will always get a retroactive extension to copyright that includes it through congress before that happens. You can argue that this is bad/unfair/unconstitutional/great/etc but that is the practical reality. Any practical proposal for a reform of the copyright system has to take this into account.

Under the current system this means that anything from that era forward also stays out of the public domain forever, including “orphan works”. The loss of these “orphan works” that are long out of print and with no clear owner is the one thing that (almost) everyone can agree is a Bad Thing. So, any reform that has any chance of passing must improve the situation with those items while preserving the interests of politically powerful copyright holders (Disney, Sony, etc). I can see some options that could do it, though in any real world implementations would reveal some flaws.

Opt-in renewal is the one we hear tossed around the most. This sets forgotten material into the public domain but preserves the copyright on anything the owner finds worthy of a nominal renewal fee. It has the added bonus of registering who you can license the publishing rights from.

Letting works fall into the public domain after being out of print for X years could also accomplish the above goals. It would also have the added bonus of encouraging publishers to keep a work available/in-print to preserve their rights.

Lastly we could instead create a special extension for trademarks, franchises, and corporate identifiers. Things strongly associated with an ongoing business could be protected for a longer period. DC would keep Superman and Disney would keep Mickey, but an out of print science article would not get the new extension and would eventually enter the public domain.

None of these proposals would satisfy copyleft purists or “hands off my copyright!” paranoids but they could be a reasonable starting point for compromise.

Comment Been through this once (Score 1) 190

I lived through a cricket plague as a kid on a farm in rurral CA (different species). One morning I looked out the window and the lawn was black... and moving. They came into the house through every crack and crevice. The road was carpeted with them to the point that the school threatened to stop sending the bus. They showed up en mass a couple of other years but never again that bad.

A side note: I guess that LZ and the Stones now qualify as Weapons Grade Music.

Slashdot Top Deals

Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting somebody else to do the work. -- John G. Pollard