All is forgiven!

At last.... thanks.

>>>First paragraph: "each author brings their own unique insights" should be "each author brings his or her own unique insights."

that is being picky.

>>>Fourth paragraph: "in defense to how security is often perceived" should be "in defense against how security is often perceived."

also picky.

>>>>Sixth paragraph: "online-advertising" should be "online advertising."

Picky

>>>Eighth paragraph: "Chapter 7 is about the PGP" should be "Chapter 7 is about PGP."

At last, a REAL error.

>>>In "web of trust model, and recent enhancements bring PGP's web of trust up to date" the comma should be removed and "bring" should be changed to "bringing."

Picky

>>>Tenth paragraph: "a fascinating an enjoyable read" should be "a fascinating and enjoyable read."

wow, a real mistake!

>>>Eleventh paragraph: In "It is a good book for those whose who think information security" the word "whose" should be removed.

Terrible error!

>>>There you go :)

thanks.

Oh, one last thing, this is /.

No one is that picky.

But am glad we have people like you.

Karl

I DO CARE!!!

That is why I am making my sixth request of you to please tell me.

Rather than a cat and mouse game here, can't you give me but two of the grammatical errors?

Please! Please!!!

You sez he made errers, but u refuze to tellus what they be.

Sorry...obviously what?

I felt you did not explain yourself.

I am still waiting for the specific 'errors'.

Thanks!

And to think someone thought that CHKV was a programming language :)

I lot that law, very funny!!

>>>I really just want to see better book reviews on Slashdot.

One could argue that is an oxymoron.

This is /., not the NY Times book reviews.

You 'claimed' there are errors, but now suddenly can't find them?

They be thare mate! :)

>>>>Oh leave me alone.

you made the claim,I called you on it; now I have to leave you alone? Please play fair.

The problem is that people see certs as an end-all, when they really are the beginning.

Certifications are great, but one should use them as a stepping stone, not a retiring stone.

It is style you refer to.

What are the errors you claim to have found?

>>>Few spelling or grammar mistakes, though they were fairly noticeable and detracted from the tone of the piece.

Beside a missing space, could not find any of the glaring spelling or grammar mistakes. Can you point them out?

Isn't it a stylistic issue?
Some people do standard book reviews, chapter 1, chapter 2,chapter x.....
Others write a more macro-approach to the book.
Is one better?
Matter of opinion.