All is forgiven!
All is forgiven!
At last.... thanks.
>>>First paragraph: "each author brings their own unique insights" should be "each author brings his or her own unique insights."
that is being picky.
>>>Fourth paragraph: "in defense to how security is often perceived" should be "in defense against how security is often perceived."
>>>>Sixth paragraph: "online-advertising" should be "online advertising."
>>>Eighth paragraph: "Chapter 7 is about the PGP" should be "Chapter 7 is about PGP."
At last, a REAL error.
>>>In "web of trust model, and recent enhancements bring PGP's web of trust up to date" the comma should be removed and "bring" should be changed to "bringing."
>>>Tenth paragraph: "a fascinating an enjoyable read" should be "a fascinating and enjoyable read."
wow, a real mistake!
>>>Eleventh paragraph: In "It is a good book for those whose who think information security" the word "whose" should be removed.
>>>There you go
Oh, one last thing, this is
No one is that picky.
But am glad we have people like you.
I DO CARE!!!
That is why I am making my sixth request of you to please tell me.
Rather than a cat and mouse game here, can't you give me but two of the grammatical errors?
You sez he made errers, but u refuze to tellus what they be.
I felt you did not explain yourself.
I am still waiting for the specific 'errors'.
And to think someone thought that CHKV was a programming language
I lot that law, very funny!!
>>>I really just want to see better book reviews on Slashdot.
One could argue that is an oxymoron.
You 'claimed' there are errors, but now suddenly can't find them?
They be thare mate!
>>>>Oh leave me alone.
you made the claim,I called you on it; now I have to leave you alone? Please play fair.
The problem is that people see certs as an end-all, when they really are the beginning.
Certifications are great, but one should use them as a stepping stone, not a retiring stone.
It is style you refer to.
What are the errors you claim to have found?
>>>Few spelling or grammar mistakes, though they were fairly noticeable and detracted from the tone of the piece.
Beside a missing space, could not find any of the glaring spelling or grammar mistakes. Can you point them out?
Isn't it a stylistic issue?
Some people do standard book reviews, chapter 1, chapter 2,chapter x.....
Others write a more macro-approach to the book.
Is one better?
Matter of opinion.
Men love to wonder, and that is the seed of science.