No, that's where we stand. We have plenty of airborne assets, like the Predator and such. It seems that's where the focus has been for a while. Spy satellites are multi billion dollar platforms, with years of development and serious limitations.
Respectfully, that's not an argument; it's a rant with a basis in reducto ad absurdem.
I'm not saying I disagree with you (or even that I agree). I'm pointing out that you did not refute a single point with anything approaching valid logic.