Yes there are many funtions we need a government for. What does that have to do with the fact that they suck at it?
Sure, none of these are done perfectly, but they're done adequately for the function of society;
No. It is not adequate. They are expensive and bad at it. It took FEMA 5 days to get water to the people in the stadium. Not "Because "Bush". Because government sucks at doing things. So you want them doing only a very few things that only government should do. Because THEY SUCK!
for contrast look at all the countries which don't bother with these functions.
So where there is no functioning government "Things Suck". That is the argument you are making to tell me how great government employees are?
It's great to be a rich person in the developing world, but not so great if you have no guarantee that your savings account won't vanish, or that the president's cousin won't steal your startup if it gets profitable, or that the steel you buy is of correct tensile strength, or that your employees are educated and healthy.
It is funny to me that you think those things do not happen now.
These are tasks that private companies won't or can't take on for any amount, mostly due to the vast scales involved.
Underwriters Laboratory. Look it up.
The wonder is how well the government agencies do, with a hugely overworked and underpaid staff.
Citation Needed. Mostly because the pay plus benefits of government employees are above that of private workers.
Of course, the previous administration's attempts to privatize the military ended the suggestions that private companies could do that particular function better.
Oh good. "But Bush!". Glad you got that in there. That really helped pull together your argument.