As for Gun Safety, if you check out the recent rhetoric on the background checks legislation you'll find a lot of people very skeptical of anything labeled "gun safety."
You've almost got it. It's skeptical of anything done by our government in the name of safety, which they clearly do not give one tenth of one fuck about.
I've had enough internet conversations on gun rights to meet people who oppose gun-safes, ever for long guns, on principle.
There are crazy people out there. However, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Bans on cheap handguns have already been struck down as unconstitutional, because they are biased against the poor. Instead of worrying about whether disadvantaged people will steal guns, why not worrying about whether people are disadvantaged? Oh, because the entire system is based on having people be disadvantaged? Which is part of what the guns are for to begin with.
As for the most likely use of the map, one man's "harassment" is another man's freedom of speech.
No, no it is not, and if you believe that then you don't understand freedom of speech.