Any viewers for whom the movie experience was their first Watchmen exposure want to weigh in?
That movie was my first exposure to Watchmen, and IMO it's not that good of a movie. It lacked a cohesive plot. Telling the backstory through all of those flashbacks made it feel like an episode of Lost, and took the attention away from the main plot. The flashblack mechanism didn't even work right because there were too many characters, and too much emphasis on things not important to deliver character or plot development effectively. I guess I can't blame 'em. The whodunit mystery and the evil plan are trite. The movie is not complex or subtle, it's just bloated. And the choice of songs completely lacks subtlety. Think about it-- "The Times are a changin'" next to a montage showing how the times changed, "The Sound of Silence" at a funeral, "All along the Watchtower"... wait do I even need to go on?
Now the fanboys say it's supposed to be deep, thinking movie because it deconstructs the superhero archetypes or whatever. Now ask yourself this question: why is that important for a movie seeking a broad audience? Answer: it's not! And to top it all off, most of the acting was poor.
I can tell the difference between a normal (128, 192) MP3 and FLAC.
I doubt that. Transparency starts around 192, just by lumping 128 and 192 together suggests to me that you think they are audibly the same. The reality is that 128 and 192 are more dissimilar than 192 and flac. And then once you get to ~250 to 320 it's extremely difficult to tell mp3 apart from lossless in blind tests. You can find a program, I think it's called abx, online and it will allow you to blind test yourself. Now that this is the real way to see when mp3 becomes transparent to you. I treat all blanket assertions that mp3 sounds audibly inferior to flac as suspec. It really is just a matter of when (and not if) mp3 becomes transparent to your ears.
Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for economists. -- John Kenneth Galbraith