I think they would just wire the cars with a speed limiter based on the current street's speed limit... just so long as the car doesn't suddenly slow down to 25 on a freeway overpass because the road under the bridge has a lower speed limit.
Why would they do that? When the OP's suggestion would allow the government to generate revenue with a reduced expenditure, while yours would reduce the amount of revenue the government gets from traffic law violation tickets.
My '12 Challenger R/T has a USB port...
Yes, but what connection are you going to want in 2018? I would be almost willing to bet (I have a rule, if I place a bet with you, you may as well just give me the money, I already know the outcome--not think, know) it will not be a USB port.
the problem is that you don't have a right to food, health care, or housing.
Exactly what do you mean by a "right to food, health care, or housing"? What does that mean? Do you mean that you have the right to have someone provide you with those? If so, who is forced to do the work necessary to provide you with them?
Alternatively you can obstruct him at every turn and show that you are hypocrites that talk democracy and freedom
So, what you are proposing is that Congressmen prove that they are in favor of democracy by voting the opposite of the way their constituents elected them to vote and that they are in favor of freedom by voting to support a man who believes that the government can order you to act against your religious beliefs?
Considering that polls consistently show that more U.S. citizens oppose Obama's policies than support them, I am not sure how you get the idea that voting for his policies represents democracy in action.
Have you reconsidered a computer career?