Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Does Everything He Says Need to Be a Story (Score 1) 211

Really, why make every Tweet to be a story or post. Who cares what this doofus thinks. He clearly just says random shit most of the time without thinking.

Also, Apple/Google/Valve/etc. do a lot for their cut. Credit Card fees, charge-backs, hosting, very limited QA, offset the cost for the free stuff, etc. While yeah 30% will be too much, but I'm sure 3% they would lose money, or have to drastically cut back services/features.

Comment This doesn't seem very hard to fix for Netflix (Score 1) 113

Even without anything fancy like machine learning, this doesn't seem like it would be hard to fix.

Give points out for "suspicious" behavior, set break points for warnings "It appears that this account is in use by someone else. Was X use on Y date also you? [Note: Netfflix/Disney+ accounts are not to be shared with people outside your household]" , text/email confirmations to the account holder, etc.
They could even offer an amnesty type deal, offer limited huge discounts for accounts flagged with an option to export a profile to the new account.

Points could be issued for :
  - "Stationary devices" (tvs/Apple TVs/Desktops/Xboxs/Rokus/etc.) being used in multiple places
  - Different account profiles being used consistently on the same different locations/devices
  - Multiple mobile devices using different Wifi networks consistently.

Comment Re:The "user" is the product (Score 2) 40

The theory is that the content is curated/guided by the CCP because it is stuff they wouldn't sanction. They boost content that is "bad" because we use it and people in China can't.

  - People acting "correctly" or showing positive traits = bury / discourage this behavior in the US.
  - Dangerous trends, controversial content, random sexy things = boost / encourage in the US.

As far as conspiracy theories go, that sounds like it would be totally viable.

Comment Not a Bad Idea (Score 1) 49

As much as I dislike it, that does seem like it would be a pretty good solution. Most of the big piracy places would get squashed. Which I guess is secondary to their goals of being better able to restrict the content their people have access to.

But it seems like it would need work, it doesn't seem like it would be too difficult to find 100+ likes of pirated content on YouTube, Facebook, or Twitch.

Comment Re:Screw the Religious Exemptions Too (Score 1) 227

True. Luckily more and more are challenging them or requiring significant documentation to support such claims.

But even so, who cares. Just because they find a priest from Q-Church to fill out a form, doesn't mean a business has to allow it. I think it is time to no longer consider these wacky religious exemptions as "reasonable accommodations". "I appreciate that your Church of The Naked Man doesn't allow you to wear clothes and cover God's Devine work, but need to wear clothes in the office. If not find someplace else to work."

Comment Re:Screw the Religious Exemptions Too (Score 1) 227

By "major" I didn't mean to say "all" or something. I was using that as a sample. I'm sure there are many smaller religions that are opposed to it. In addition Christianity doesn't have a top person that can say X is good or bad.

But who cares, there is no good religious argument to be made against the vaccine for people in modern society. Virtually all medications both over the counter and prescription have been tainted fetal cell line testing. That also applies to many foods and cosmetics. So unless you're Amish and you only eat food you grow/kill you using the byproducts of testing in the aborted fetal cells.

Comment Re:Screw the Religious Exemptions Too (Score 1) 227

Saying there is nothing in it to some is analogous to saying we murdered this person in cold blood and stole their cellular phone. There is nothing objectionable in the cellular phone of this murdered person or the information extracted from it.

Tylenol came out in the 1950s and aspirin in the 1890s predating fetal lines from abortion.

Of course most people will just find religion for their exemption anyway but this was an avoidable problem for the people who actually care and might otherwise elect to get vaccinated.

I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about but there are no fetal cells in the vaccines. Yes cells from the fetal lines have been used in testing, but that goes for the same thing for pretty much every other medication, Viagra, high blood pressure, flu vaccines, cold medications, etc.. Aspirin and Tylenol have since been tested on the fetal cells.

So unless they also forgo all other medications they don't have a leg to stand on. It is obvious that they are just using it as an excuse, and I'm glad more and more agencies or businesses are calling them on their BS.

Comment Re:Unfortunately It's Not a False Strike (Score 1) 70

Nope. It falls squarely under criticism and commentary. Let's look at the four pillars:

  • Commercial versus noncommercial: It's a YouTube video. Assuming it wasn't monetized by the person who uploaded it, it's clearly noncommercial use.
  • Nature of the work: It's a piece of software, and you're reporting a bug. That's a lot closer to factual use of nonfiction than borrowing bits of a fiction work.
  • The amount and portion thereof: Assuming it's a short clip, that's very small and very little.
  • The effect of the use on the potential market for the original work: This clip clearly cannot serve as a replacement for the original work. (Any other, non-replacement use, such as loss of sales because of negative commentary is *not* relevant for fair use purposes.

So unless the original poster posted a three-hour clip and monetized it, I think it's safe to say that this usage falls so solidly under fair use that no judge in his/her right mind would disagree.

This isn't some security researcher or something, he's a dude who has a side-hustle making new world videos. He posts between 1-3 videos a day, most of them about 10-15 minutes. All the videos I checked were monetized, a calculator estimates his income to be about $50 a day. So, totally commercial.

The part where he demos the bug takes about 1 minute, the video was a 12 minutes long, entirely of in-game footage (as these content creators do, he just talks a lot and goes around and around to pad the video to be >10 minutes for the extra ad). So it's not like he was even trying to spread the word, just create content for his channel.

Correct, this clip would not replace the market. One could say that being able to watch so many videos of a game might discourage people from buying it. I've not purchased games I might have otherwise because I experienced enough of the game via YouTube or Twitch. But that argument hasn't been used in courts so who knows how it would fly.

So, it's not as clear cut as it seemed.

[The video has been since put back and he got an apology from Amazon they blamed a glitch. Maybe they've been testing a system to try get rid of expolit instructional videos since the game has been such a dumpster fire.]

Slashdot Top Deals

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...