Comment Re:Watch you react to advertising (Score 2) 73
You pay for it; Google/Apple/Microsoft benefits from it. A terrific arrangement.
(I didn't read the article, so...)
What exactly is "data science"?
Agreed.
Sounds like Google is using this as an excuse to limit support on otherwise perfectly good hardware to an arbitrary six-year limit as defined by a vendor. Never mind that fact that devices can very easily be upgraded to newer linux versions.
They've already ended product support for their "Do no evil" mantra.
People cutting the cable cord dont consume much local programming to begin with. Thats why they had cable.
Wrong. I cut the cord because I was doing exactly the opposite of what you suggest: I was watching mostly local programming. The other cable TV content I watched I figured I could live without. So, why pay for what I could get for free.
Incidentally, when watching OTA there is no added delay to broadcast reception that you would get via cable, satellite service, etc. I used to call friends on the phone during football games, wait for a game score to happen, and then cheer loudly - between 8-15 seconds before they would see it. Fun!
Couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you, Chas.
If the bot's (or bots') comments are to be kept, then is it not reasonable that everyone (legal U.S. citizens) should be able to use a bot to post comments to the FCC?
I mean, if they allow one man's set of bot comments then, legally, don't they have to accept everybody's bots' comments?
If they don't, are they infringing freedom of speech?
That's the way I read it, too.
Probable disclaimer from Microsoft:
Users of Microsoft Visual Studio for Mac OSX may find certain features of Visual Studio do not function as expected under the Mac OSX platform. For those users, we recommend using Visual Studio on a Microsoft Windows-based platform, to improve reliability.
Translation:
You didn't really expect us to write quality software for a competing OS that didn't eventually drive you over to Windows, did you? Silly user...
It seems to me that this is an example of corporations quite clearly forcing consumers into something they don't want. They only way to stop them is to NOT buy these devices.
I have 2 older iPods, a smartphone, a surround sound a/v receiver, CD players, MP3 players, ancient transistor radios, etc., and NONE of them work with USB headphones. All of them work with standard audio jacks. I'm not investing in new headphones, dongles, cables, etc.
Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.