Be reasonable. They can also submit anything that doesn't fit their scope of propaganda directly to the government and remove any hint of anonymity to thus gain more favor with the government, as well.

Hmm. Maybe it's the "you don't have a way to opt out of receiving mail" part of things?

This is the actual truth. You are 100% correct.

It is actually proven that having real time traffic data to make traffic decisions is to the benefit of everyone driving. On the flip side, I don't really like how that equation works out for your personal privacy.

This is so laughably false I'm amazed you even tried to push such a logic. Please stop asking people to prove a negative.

Geoengineering is something you are referencing with no knowledge; an increase in seismic risk is exactly that.

Considering they used their money to make this into the system, I see absolutely no reason to simply say "it's okay, they're using the rules they created".

That's 100% wrong and dishonest.

Remember, we have made a strong stance against asset forfeiture going forward. The assets however, have not - and are thus still considered guilty.

To anyone who has a shred of fear of flying, the game of "screwing with the pilots for laughs" is not fucking funny.

Except that this has ZERO to do with what's going on. The fact that they broke the law to basically steal his laptop, this has nothing to do with screwing with the pilots.

Pearson does a lot of things; I'd find them fairly neutral in the process - what they do will work with basically anything.

That's not to say what they do is good? I find Pearson to be shit when it comes to education tools - they are filled with bloatware, drm, and things that don't provide any benefit to thing using them, but I wouldn't really blame them for anything here.

I would blame the superintendent and apple for sticking their nose into more sales under the guise of supporting education.

I doubt it would happen for a variety of reasons, but I'd love to see Google find a way to work with Tesla on this.

While they didn't willingly/intentionally give their information to the NSA, the fact that they were compromised by the NSA means that they should still be considered compromised going forward, so you are correct.

TLDR: don't do business with the NSA. This also means we really, really, really need to get rid of FIPS as well.

GMO foods kill? More like your DNA is modified by what you eat, so eating foods with modified DNA may have undesirable effects (see: obesity, diabetes).

I don't think I've heard anyone actually state that GMO foods kill them directly, though?

Without any example, you are basically lying with your post. It's just as easy to obfuscate information by providing no example and asking people to prove a negative.

Except that it's a known key with a known loophole?

You may as well try to tell me WPA-2 encryption is meaningful. It's not.

Maybe because they're trying?

You can't just magic your way into a SCOTUS review.

No, it doesn't sound like a good strategy.

It sounds like "Spray and pray". In fact, people who don't use google do not exactly jump to searching on Bing, mostly because bing is terrible at being a search engine. Are there alternatives? Yes. Is this a way to bring light to them? Not even remotely.

Yahoo is bing, so using yahoo is using bing and is just as much garbage as bing.