Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Any proof? (Score 2) 56

The proof is that a Chinese company controls the firmware updates.

It was the exact same problem my company faced trying to sell security software globally. We were approached by representatives of a Chinese company responsible for various technology transfers, and they made it clear that the only way we were going to go into China was if they bought us. Otherwise, the mere fact that we controlled the keys was sufficient to exclude us from selling anywhere in China.

If you control the firmware, you essentially have a backdoor, and having critical security or infrastructure keys controlled by a hostile nation is a security risk. One doesn't have to prove an attack has happened, merely that it could.

Comment Re:Cable Internet (Score 1) 150

A lot of the multiple signups are legitimate. As an example, I'm registered multiple times.

I'm sitting at an Airport. Literally, the only ISP actually here is AT&T Fiber. They want $800/mo for 20mbps. We have three buildings, and before I got brought in, the plan was to pay $2400/mo.

I put in a wireless point-to-point, and now we're paying $800/mo for 20mbps that's split among three buildings. I had a cable point-to-point that would have made things better, but COVID shut that down (can't get in the building). I've got another company willing to do point-to-point, but that's going to be $800/mo for 100mbit.

If Starlink is reasonable, that's three buildings here.

I have a home and a travel trailer for when I'm working in the field. Wireless internet through hotspots and trailer parks suck. There's a fourth install.

The cable internet keeps going up and down at my house. I have cameras and automation I want to keep working. If Starlink is functional, I'm going to set it up as a secondary internet with the cable.

So, I represent at least 5 installs the moment it's available. There are plenty other people in similar situations.

Comment Re:Background Apps Using Location To Keep Running (Score 1) 41

"I don’t see why they need this"

As the parent post described, "so that it doesn't get marked idle and killed if it's running in the background while I do something else like listen to music or YouTube"

The operating system does not at present offer a way to notify an app whenever a photo is taken, and allow that application to persist long enough to do the backup. Dropbox uses background location or activity tracking (depending on the platform) to provide a way to wake up the app, in much the same way that persistent task entries were used previously on android. I don't give Dropbox those permissions, so I have to remember to go into the app to kick off those uploads.

If IOS and Android didn't have those measures, all the daemons that apps would leave running would ultimately kill everyone's battery life.

Comment Re: Antitrust.... (Score 1) 39

The general rule is that you canâ(TM)t leverage a monopoly in one industry to gain a monopoly in another.

Apple lacked the market share in the past to be considered a monopoly, so they (like other small players) were not required to open their platforms.

Mobile is now effectively a duopoly, and Google runs an open-ish platform (with APK sideloading). That puts Apple in the crosshairs for regulation.

Slashdot Top Deals

Get hold of portable property. -- Charles Dickens, "Great Expectations"

Working...