Hmm, none whatsoever of the sources you assume I'm getting info about the Tea party from (OFA website, Salon, the MSM, or HuffPo) are on my regular reading list. You seem to be basing your assumptions about my knowledge and motivations on a carefully-crafted straw-man version of generic "Liberal" thought. You already seem to know which "people I support in D.C." --- strange, I didn't mention that. And you're generally wrong, thanks to the preconceptions stilled in your mind by your propaganda overlords (speaking of "divide and conquer strategy").
Can a Christian force an Atheist-owned bakery, under the same laws, to bake Christian religious-themed cakes against their wishes and beliefs? How about a Muslim bakery and a Jewish wedding cake?
You do realize, in the case you are referring to, that the bakery was not forced to make a "gay themed wedding cake." They were asked to provide a cake, the exact same service they provide to any other customer that walked in the door. They weren't required to write "I love anal sex" in the frosting, or decorate the cake with erect wieners. When a person goes into a sandwich shop and asks for a sandwich on the menu, I don't support the shop's right to say "we don't serve black people here, get out." If a Muslim bakery only does wedding cakes with Islamic religious symbols, and that's what they offer to all their customers, then they shouldn't be expected to turn out a special-order star-of-David cake. But, they should be expected to offer the same services to red-headed customers as to blond customers. Allowing businesses to discriminate based on the race, gender, creed, etc., of their customers --- people buying the same stuff they sell to everyone else --- has a nasty history, and is not conducive to a free society.