it's not about choices or having faith, the problem behind this is that evolution is a theory that comes from scientific studies. behind creationism there's just a pedantic reading of a book made
2000 years ago by people who weren't scientist.
So Gnome vs Kde or VI vs Emacs is just a personal choice, something debatable; creationism vs evolutionism is not a personal choice, is not someting debatable: one is an idea that come from ignorant people, the other is supported by ton of book and experiments.
If you want to debate then you can go with neodarwin vs lamark (and even in this case there are proofs against lamark tough some ideas are good), but not creationism.
The world must go on accepting theories from science not fairy tales, unless you want to go back to middle ages hunt witches and die for a flu.
Scientific world keeps going with the idea that if a theory is wrong you must show what it's lacking, if you propose a new one you must provide proofs other than "because i said so".
It's time to put a bound, a big "STOP" sign on religion on this matters because it's causing only confusion and ignorance. Because today it's C vs E but tomorrow, what about a flat world vs round world ? what about a geocentric vs heliocentic ss ?
Do you want to see newers Giordano Bruno on flames because they were questioning religion ?