https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-148A1_Rcd.pdf

Here's the text of this particular FCC regulation put into effect by un-elected officials. I wonder if these regs were struck down by Congress because of the desire to do away with privacy or because of other more specific concerns with what is in this 200+ page document.

Keep the those knees jerking though!!

...intelligence documents? Just asking.

I was there at the beginning

So was I! The 90's, 00's, 10's...three decades ;-)

Oh God, please don't...

...that Hillary allowed into her SCIF room. Since she was an Original Classification Authority (OCA), she had every right to appoint others that could see classified materials including the FAXes she picked-up. Republicans are complaining about nothing again.

I think you already know this, but for the benefit of others that may be inclined to believe your statement, you could not be more incorrect in your reasoning both legally and morally.

I see that Putin's trolls have made it out again for this story.

And I'm done Putin up with the likes of you!

Democrats have not only recently rediscovered the virtues of limit government, but also the virtues of following rules?

That's great! And now we'll even see the US media bring back investigative journalism after an 8 year hiatus.

Either way, the guy is a real douche in my book. . .

If, during Trump's presidency, the labor force participation rate rises to 68% or more, will you admit in your book that you are the douche? ;-)

If it were to pass, and I doubt it will, a 15% US corporate income tax rate would likely cause a sharp rise in then a consistent level of corporate tax revenue that this nation has not experienced before.

In very simple terms: corporations now do everything to avoid taxes and with a 15% rate, many will start to actually keep cash in saving to purchase capital goods and fund future expansion.

Banks won't like it though because of less demand for their fiat dollars. And we know what kind of power the bank lobbies have.

I'm confused. I've heard of Snapchat. I don't use it. Are you sure you didn't mean $25,000,000 IPO?

I'm sincerely interested in knowing what your point is.

Whatever...why not just vote for HRC. Hell, a third party candidate brought us the first Clinton. Why not another one to really kick America in the nuts!!

Sure, then 14 years later Nixon did so much harm to the country, that he ended up resigning because of it. Some favor, huh?

Whaat? What exactly was the "so much harm" that he did to the country? He was a very effective president. Heck, he was almost more of a statist than your candidate HRC!!

What exactly is racist and/or a lie?

https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sci...

Well, it's kinda funny...