Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Basically it is grading itself (Score 4, Interesting) 121

100% on the mark. My nephew is a teacher and he says that there is very little that they can do about the misuse of these AI(Asinine Idiocy) software. The kids are too stupid or lazy to rewrite anything in their own words so it is obvious what they didn't write. The problem is that the schools have gone the way of the liberal and since they can't flunk everyone, they give the students second, third, and even four chances to redo "their work".

It's not a liberal problem, it's a parent problem. I know plenty of conservative parents who, if their kid doesn't get an A, is after the teacher, because it's their fault homework was not turned in or too much was assigned, demanding their grade be raised.

Comment Re:kWh/day considered nonsense (Score 1) 68

Another possibility is they want to lock in a reliable supply and pay a premium to ensure they don’t have to shutdown if demand exceeds supply. They want to be the last to be interrupted in such a case. Friends in the power industry tell me data centers asnt to lock in the availability of hue amounts of power and will pay for it. They have concerns for grid impact when a data center wants all the power from a plant that was to supply demand growth when data centers want to locate in their service area.

Comment Re:kWh/day considered nonsense (Score 4, Informative) 68

"63 million kilowatt hours per day" -- oh boy. This suggests that the reactor can distribute those kWh energy parcels across the day as required. Surprise: it can't do that.

Also, 63/24 is 2.625, so one of these numbers is inaccurate.

SSES produces up to 63 million KWH/day; TFA even points out AWS is only planning to use a fraction of the 2 units' output capacity. AWS has simply gotten a long term contract for power. Talen will simply continue to base load the plant and sell power to other users; the deal is no different than had AWS bought options on gas to secure a price for their power needs. But, since it is nuclear...

Comment Re:The more you tighten your grip (Score 3, Informative) 22

Except that's not what happened when Netflix did it. They cracked down on password sharing and gained subscribers. Thing is, the people who are going to pirate are probably already pirating, and those who aren't pirating aren't going to suddenly try to figure out how to pirate when a subscription for a few bucks a month solves the problem.

Most people are just going to roll over and take it, because they've gotta have their boob tube.

Exactly. For all the “I’ll just run up the Jolly Rodger” and arguing “it’s easy” you get on tech sites; most users simply want their TV and will pay for it. They don‘t want to mess with finding torrents, installing various tools and searching for content when they can easily find what they want on a pay service whenever they want.

Comment Re:These car thieves (Score 0) 93

Did he even actually try to "steal" the car, or is that just the police's spin on a homeless man looking for a place to sleep and refusing to leave the vehicle? Because my level of surprise at the latter would be "0%".

That was my first thought as well. Trespassing, perhaps, but GTA? I suspect it would be hard to make that case; especially since the car could not be driven by him and he probably was aware of that. I'm guessing he figured it would either nt move or just drive him around.

Comment Re:Right to repair bills? (Score 1) 114

So as those right to repair bills gain traction will we see and end to this? Publishing open source specs are a key component to a right to repair.

I doubt. Most of what I've seen about right to repair is for hardware and not having software locks preventing repairs; not about making component interoperable across devices.

Comment Re:History repeats (Score 1) 107

> Nothing illegal was done.

The main precedents in emulation legality are Sony v. Connectix and Sony v. Bleem, where Sony lost both cases, but drove the defendant out of business via the lawsuit. Make of that what you will.

I remember running both of them. Interesting programs but PCs lack al ot of the power needed to run well, as I recall my experience.

Comment Re:Opposite (Score 1) 79

I don't leave my kids alone with family members or anyone else. Ok now what? Why does she need privacy in her communications with random people on the net?

She may not, but others might, for many reasons. That yours don't doesn't mean other s shouldn't have the ability. If my kids don't need Meta, why not just take it away altogether; after all they don't need it so why would someone else? This is a typical knee jerk reaction by politicians to be seen as "doing something to protect the kids."

Comment Re:Opposite (Score 1) 79

The reality is the opposite: if kids don't have access to encrypted communication, then is easier for abusers, stalkers and predators to spy on them and do their nasty things. Give encryption to kids!

Spoken like a true non-parent.

Ask yourself one simple question; who would you trust more to not be fooled by a grown-ass pedophile? The child, or the pedophile?

Stop enabling pedophiles to hide in kids encrypted communications that they don't really justify, because we should have a legal definition of child. The child who demands 100% privacy, can go fucking pay for 100% of that privilege. Until then, shut the fuck up and eat your peas, since I'm paying for every service you demand "privacy" on.

Considering some 93% of child molesters are family members or acquaintances so perhaps prohibiting any communication with them when yo are not around is the answer? After all, you need to protect kids from private conversations.

Comment Re: Energy usage (Score 1) 103

If I use 10 trillion watts-hours of electricity, and I report it, it's likely my company will be regulated out of existence.

It doesn't matter that I'm pulling it from solar and wind. The number alone will be used as a talking point to commence a witch hunt.

Except most isn't coming from renewables, it's good old coal or nuclear. They don't want people to realize they're trying to greenwash their usage.

There's no good reason for the government to need any special information about crypto mining electricity use. You wanna track all companies? Fine. You wanna start painting targets to choose winners and losers? Fuck off.

There is a valid reason to collect this data, and from all users as you state - grid stability and demand projections. The ISOs/FERC/Utilities need to know load profiles to plan what plants to have on line as well as predict what needs to be built to meet future demand. Of course, they already have a good idea about current demand and can use tat to forecast as well.

Comment Energy usage (Score 3, Insightful) 103

I suspect the miners objection is not to fill out an energy usage survey, info a utility could supply, rathe it's they don't want people to know how much. Having worked in the utility, my contacts tell me data centers essentially want gigawatts of uninterruptible power. I suspect crypto miners consume similar loads. The data center folks also tell them to not shutdown or build more coal plants to meet the demand, green goals be damned. Call me a cynic but I suspect the only green the data centers care about are those that go not their bank account.

Slashdot Top Deals

"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight

Working...