talking to myself here, probably.

  this slash makes me itch, really should read the article, however.

this statement

"carried on litters or stretchers -- both easier to navigate up a ramp"

is entirely false.

it may seem true, without experience, but just try it.

you may get up a short ramp, carrying a heavy weight, of any kind, without much effort, but i will happily race you, even at my age, up any serious flight of stairs, compared with any equivalent ramp, your choice of slope, and we will see whose hamstrings last the longest.

this slash talks rubbish, and although i should not waste time on this, i will now go read the article - thank you.

talking off the top of my head, without citation.

most of these sites, as far as we know, were built in the later eras of the faiths they represent, and were run by large groups and usually powerful groups of officiates, who usually fed themselves on the sacrifices of the faithful.

those ramps were to make it easier for the faithful to deliver sacrifices, on wheels.

i bet you.

it's all just part of that "special" relationship, that began with the thatcher and reagan, was consummated by the bush and blair, and has now become incestuous, and kinky, between with the johnson and the trump.

that linkedin are up to no good.

i don't have any observable proof of this, however this article helps, thanks.

am i wrong to think that the Huawei / USA hardware debate is really just about which country gets to install it's own spyware?

i have no basis on which to make this assumption, it just seems obvious, to me, that this is what is happening.

what chance have we, the unwashed masses, of influencing the matter?

in my opinion it does not really matter which hardware is used, only that it is completely open to public scrutiny.

that there can be no security through obscurity should be made a law.

how do we make this happen?

thank you for the summary - i'm from the future, and it's the same up there.

get an anechoic chamber

author is complaining his games are not compatible over time.

his games.

not sure why i bothered to read this, the author sucks.

especially in india.

you can spin this any way you want, but the fact remains that it is destruction, and a waste of resources, in the name of profit, the most false of all prophets, and for this the lords of karma, i pray, will extract a price.

given that i am only looking at a quote from clinick, which may be taken out of it's full context, i am disgusted by the choice of words.

everything in this statement is an advertisement for andy's product, and there is no apology at all, they just failed to live up to their own marketing shill.

i try to like microsoft, honestly i do, but they are such backward creeps, sometimes.

this one IS broken.

OP said "The tests are finding large numbers of people in the U.S. who were infected but never became seriously ill."

what i want to know is - how many of these "not seriously ill" people are infectious?

what three words?

https://what3words.com/

"alphabitch" google is once again applying too much power where it is not needed, too late, and for their own gain, i think.

sorry if this has been mentioned before, do not have time to read all comments.

all the chatter seems to be about China, what i would like to know is what will replace Huawei, where will it come from, and can it be _trusted_?

sorry, don't have time to read all the comments properly, are the details somewhere i can read about it?