Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Ridiculous patent system (Score 1) 255

No, all fundamental discoveries are made by government. Commercial entities have never invented anything.

That is because profit is incompatible with social benefit.

We need to encourage more funding from government through taxation of corporation. Let's give government more control over corporations.

There are intermediate entities like old AT&T labs where invented transistor was invented. Note that because AT&T was a monopoly the patent was licensed for only a nominal fee. If it was a pure commercial company expect the computer revolution delayed by a decade.

Comment Re:Ridiculous patent system (Score 4, Insightful) 255

About the only things that deserve patents are fundamental discoveries and drugs that are unique and cost hundreds of millions to develop and test. And even then, just provide some kind of "formula patent" that only lasts 5-6 years.

I know of very few cases when a fundamental discovery was made by a commercial company, they usually shy away from anything that takes a decade or more to develop. Usually this is funded by the goverment which is supposed to have a longer term view.

Comment Re:Yes, but other than that, how did you like it? (Score 3, Insightful) 453

From the article:

Update: For those of you inquiring about the strength of my Hotmail password – it was a seven-letter string of lowercase letters. Not a dictionary word, but part acronym, part proper noun. It’s not the world’s strongest password, and I can feel the parental glare of Davey Winder from 200 miles away, but it wasn’t that weak, either.

Yeah, not a very strong password. What the hell was he thinking? At least mix case and have one number. Passwords I use have mixed case, numbers and symbols in it so it's not so easy to guess.

Why would a moderate strength password not be enough ? I am sure even MS rate-limits login attempts. And if someone got root to Hotmail servers you are screwed anyway.

Comment Re:Paradoxical (Score 1) 465

When you transmit particles though matter, or bounce them off of a surface, do they keep their properties? I don't know much about particle physics, but I thought that when this happens, particles are being absorbed, and new particles emitted. i.e. light doesn't actually "bounce" off of a mirror, but the particle interactions within the surface of the matter that makes up the mirror give a result that makes the photon appear to bounce. If this is true, wouldn't slowing things down with fiber optic cable or mirrors break the experiment?

The situation I was wondering about it this:

Victor has been sent to a distant planet, and is supposed to relay information to earth. For simplicity sake, lets say it's a yes or no answer (this is a simplification with a single bit that could be extended to bigger messages).

The experiment described in the article is done many times in succession (lets say a million times) with Alice and Bob recording results, and victor choosing the same thing every iteration (he will entangle for all million attempts, or not for all million attempts). While Alice and Bob cannot communicate directly with Victor to see whether he has entangled or not, the first handful of observations that they make would be indistinguishable from randomness, but after several thousand iterations, wouldn't there be a significant statistical deviation towards correlation of Alice and Bob's results if Victor was entangling?

In this way, couldn't victor communicate with Alice and Bob instantaneously?

I am not sure, but I don't think there is a paradox as for Victor to have carried off the photon pair implies causal relationship.

Perhaps, this experiment is similar to one where you send the photons into the black box and can tell whether the entanglement have been destroyed or not, without anything coming out of the black box.

Comment Re:Paradoxical (Score 1) 465

If you have nice and stable mirrors (or fiber) then no collapse will occur. In particular, recall that people have used kilometer-scale fiber-optic link to send entangled photons for cryptographic purposes.

If you want to be confused a bit more, look up "weak measurement" ;)

Comment Re:Like Linux? (Score 1) 239

Isn't this basically what Linus Torvalds did with Linux? If it can be done with an OS couldn't you do it with a compiler or an interpreter? I'm not a programmer, so the likeliness of this story being true is beyond my ability to judge.

Both general GNU and Linux developers were very careful to avoid infringing copyrights and a lot of work started after the original Unix patents expired.

Comment Re:Paradoxical (Score 4, Interesting) 465

I'm not sure how serious you are, but I'll point out the problem at the risk of killing the joke. The issue is in step 2. Photons travel at the speed of light (by definition). Because we cannot send information faster than the speed of light, the photons arrive at Victor strictly before any message from Alice and Bob.

Just use a fiber optic cable to make them wait longer. Or bounce between mirrors in a zigzag - this way light trajectory can be long, but the spatial distance can be short.

Comment Re:It could have been a much bigger media event (Score 1) 279

It hit in daylight over Reno-Tahoe.

Imagine if it had hit just a bit further west at night with clear weather. That would have resulted in a very bright flash at night and the aforementioned "rumbling and shaking" over the San Francisco Bay Area.

Now imagine that the orbital dynamics were such that this happened in 1982 instead of 2012. Then you get a bright flash and a rumble over a major metro area during the Cold War.

No worries - that meteorites show up on radar (strongly) was well-known since World War 2.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...