Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:That's why its called... (Score 1) 64

coopetition

Awesome, it's a mix of cooperation and competition. Still not quite sure how that works though.

That's because you can only make it work with a Co-Grinder (no patents pending due to trade secrets). Please contact a representative to get a nondisclosure agreement processed so we can discuss the solutions to your co-needs.

Comment Re:Excuse me... not a programmer's fault. (Score 1) 276

I'm not a satellite engineer, but wouldn't it be easy enough to just install a lead shield around the PCB to protect from most radiation? As long as the shield's not too thick, it shouldn't add too much weight, especially compared to using older-technology chips that'll take up more board space.

To cosmic rays, a lead shield is just a bigger impact target and a source for more secondary particles. Unless your lead shield is larger than current spacecraft.

Comment Re:Well (Score 1) 756

news for you, any manned space exploration we do in the next two centuries will still leave all our eggs in the earth basket.

That is true. Fortunately, any manned space colonization will reduce the basket problem somewhat. Even if only a few survive, we have to try to get a few to Oregon in order to have a chance at Oregon growing. Wherever you live, can I buy your land at pioneer prices?

Comment Re:Well (Score 1) 756

I blame Star Trek.

Every time they have a problem near a planet they immediately start to spiral in.

Apologists/idiots invented a 'new kind of powered orbit'.

If we had Star Trek's cheap power and movement tools, we'd have to establish traffic control on the "Dawn Patrol" powered parking orbits, where craft would be cruising to watch the sunrise and sunset. Falling out of orbit due to propulsion failure would also be a routine occurrence. It's an obvious side effect.

Comment Re:Well (Score 2) 756

Well when you say that the Earth is going to become less habitable and try to then say that is why we should go to places even less habitable makes one think you are a nutter. Why couldn't we use the same technologies that would allow us to live on, say, Mars to live on Earth as it becomes less habitable?

I'll watch on Mars while you experiment on your own planet, thank you very much.

Comment Re:Well (Score 1) 756

5) They're coming over here to shut us up for good. For the good of the Galactic Corporation, as such stay-at-home stick-in-the-muds just aren't good for business, and there's no use wasting all this nickel-iron on a useless planetary mantle.

Comment Re:Well (Score 1) 756

Our vapid advertisements and ghastly reality TV dreck will still be cruising the aether long after we are a thin layer of ash in one of the smaller gravity wells surrounding a dying star of no particular distinction...

Don't know much about the Earth's rotation, do you? How about directional broadcast TV antennas?

Comment Re:Ironic? (Score 1) 756

It seems reasonable that debating moon travel 40 years after Apollo might be considered unexpected. What am I missing?

Well, a single science fiction author, Heinlein, did have a Hiatus in interplanetary travel. So we can debate whether it was unexpected. Although even Heinlein thought we'd quickly have large colonies on the Moon.

What actually was unexpected was that ridiculously large rocket, the Saturn V. We shouldn't have been able to use a giant bottle rocket to toss a few men on the Moon. We should have built space stations which could build and refuel spacecraft. Infrastructure should have made the Moon much cheaper to reach.

Comment Re:Noscript (Score 1) 321

There's not much cost involved in using a subdomain for advertising, as soon as an advertising company supplies a plugin for your CMS which does all the work for you (other than editing your DNS entries once). Looking at WordPress plugins, I see there is at least one which uses subdomains, so at least for the popular WordPress platform it is possible to write a plugin which recognizes subdomains.

Slashdot Top Deals

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...