Comment Re:Madness (Score 2) 198
No. It was known to be false and sourced from Russian intelligence officers.
No. It was known to be false and sourced from Russian intelligence officers.
For good measure.
>Getting your national news via YouTube videos is like getting your history lessons from Futurama
If someone on youtube sources every video from mainstream news outlets for their commentary, how is that different than what CNN or FOX or any other news outlet do?
Having multiple perspectives is good but does it matter how established they are like CNN+Fox+NBC+BBC?
Is Tim Pool lying about the news he reads that he shows the articles as he reads? Does that mean the news that he does read is lies (which he does catch funny enough sourced by other articles)?
At best you can say he is selective based on his bias. To that I would say, who isn't? Every media source is selective on what they report. Have you noticed the recent text messages from the FBI overseeing Trump Russia Collusion was mostly brushed aside by many outlets? I noticed despite being more "bombshell" than a repeat article about Trump taxes.
He has is opinions and they can and are wrong sometimes. he does a decent job of differentiating between what is his opinion vs the news he is reading for the day.
So, I guess I am asking for clarification on the lies you think Tim says.
They lied to the courts with known false information to justify spying on Trumps campaign.
yes it is just like a cop planting false information.
So cops can plant false evidence for a warrant.
You are beyond hopeless.
Let me ask another way.
Do you think it is appropriate for cops to plant false evidence to justify a warrant? That is basically what happened.
Let me repeat this again more slow because you don't understand.
They knew it was bad and still used it for FISA and their investigation into Trumps campaign. They lied to the courts.
Holy shit dude.
FBI gets tip.
FBI knows tip is based on lies partly because Steele was discredited and investigates that tip.
FBI still uses that tip anyway to get FISA warrant.
FBI lies to the court and uses that tip. Repeatedly.
You: but the FBI investigated the tip!!!
Get past step two for one bloody second.
Great you don't like FISA. Now understand that the FBI abused that crappy system with lies, manipulation, and cover up. People in the previous administration and FBI need to be jailed for what happened.
> Yes. After they investigated.
Ok, you are stuck on "they investigated". The FBI knew it was bad information but still used it. That's not "investigated and threw away". That's lying to the courts with known false information and fabricated evidence in some cases. Do you not understand this ? How do you not understand this? What are you missing here?
> here you're confusing the Steele dossier with the Russian interference
No. You are wrong. The source of Steele was Russian disinformation. From the link. Steele got his lies from Russia sources which turned out to be connected to the FSB. I think in one case was just a guy in a bar drinking.
Ohr told agents in November 2016 he “never believed” Steele was “making up information or shading it” and that he believed Steele was just passing along what his sources in Russia were telling him
>Read the Senate report and the Mueller report.
I have. Now have you read the Horrowitz report and the current Durham investigation? Because an FBI agent is being charged for manipulating evidence. FBI have erased data on 15 phones used by Mueller. You are hung up on one or two details and miss everything else.
The FBI lied to the courts. Used known false information. Manipulated evidence. And deleted their records. Your rebuttle "they investigated that evidence". What does that do when they still used known lies to get their FISA warrants?
>All this is pretty well documented; there shouldn't be any dispute on that part of the facts.
Which is sad that you keep parroting partisan lies without thought or care to what actually happened.
> they investigated a tip.
And also used it for FISA applications. They knew it was salacious lies from Russian FSB but still used it to spy on Trump's campaign. Read the Horrowitz report and the Durham investigation.
>r: it says that the Steele dossier was paid for by the DNC
It was. All of the funding for Steele was done by the DNC. During the primaries is when Fusion was funded by the Free Beacon. After Trump won the nomination they gave it up and the DNC took over.
>They investigated the tip, which is what they're supposed to do, and determined that part of it (the Steele dossier part) had no credibility, and that other parts of it were accurate.
That is a lie.
https://www.washingtonexaminer...
Steele's dossier was used in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications to obtain surveillance against Trump campaign associate Carter Page.
The redacted FISA documents released in 2018 show the DOJ and FBI made extensive use of Steele’s dossier, which included a series of salacious and unverified allegations regarding Trump and Russia, in order to obtain surveillance through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court against former Trump campaign associate Carter Page. Steele put his research together in 2016 at the behest of Fusion GPS, which had been hired by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the Perkins Coie law firm. Steele receiving Democratic funding was never revealed to the court.
It croaked last night.
> won't feature abort
Everyday astronaut did a good video on this topic.
SpaceX is doing fine and getting some grant money from NASA for Artemis. Although, interestingly enough one of the challenges for Starship is that it is so big that landing on the moon will kick up a lot of dust causing potential problems. In one of their concept art pieces they had some thrusters positioned fairly high up on Starship to avoid such landing events.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.
