All four dismissals occurred in the Northern District of Illinois.' I don't see how Prenda thinks this is going to make one lick of difference to an already angry Judge."
Prenda believes the California judge does not have the power to compel out-of-state Prenda "employees" to appear. I would bet a dollar that one of the Prenda guilty parties lives either in Illinois, or the 7th Circuit federal jurisdiction. If they don't dismiss cases in jurisdictions where they live, and things unfold as they have in California, they could face arrest.
Exercise for the student: that SmartNet system carries all of information needed to locate every cop car in town, whether they know it or not. Plot 'em with Google Maps in real time!
Sorry, this is incorrect, as far as I know. You might be thinking of various "automatic vehicle location systems" (AVLS), or perhaps there is a smartnet feature I'm not aware of. Our local police and fire use a disjoint AVLS solution from the smartnet. The police AVLS is in the clear, but requires pinging the car, causing a chime in the car. The fire AVLS is always transmitting. There is good reason not to encrypt the police AVLS -- it is only queried during emergencies and at those times it is critical that the request get through. The countermeasure for the lack of encryption is the in-car chime.
Mmmpf. HF is where all the fun is.
Savoring the "accuracy" now... Mmmmpf. Somewhat tasteless in that regard.
If, as you say, you write your own software, then "linux support" is pretty irrelevant
By "linux support," what I mean is either a working USB driver for it, or a data sheet if there's no USB driver. The bladeRF is open hardware, with even the schematic available and all chips having public data sheets. A device that does not support linux would be a device with no programming information and no driver. I imagine they exist, but maybe I am wrong and there is no such device in the existing market of devices made by hams.
I can't help but notice that I didn't claim there was one.
You claimed this device wasn't as good as the devices which already exist. That is why my argument is not a "straw man" but a "prove that." I actually have an application for this device, but you claimed that the device was not as good as others already available but intended for the Ham market. As it turns out, the device is a better deal for my application than anything out there.
Are you having a bad day? My sympathies, if so. You seem to be grasping at the idea I'm your adversary. I'm not. I'm just some guy on the Interwebz.
The only negativity I've read toward this project has uniformly been from Hams. From that group, there has been a generally dismissive tone of, "sniff, it doesn't go down to kilohertz..." As a group, you seem to be anti-anything that isn't for Ham applications.
The negative comment you posted is your fault. Yes, it was modded up by dummies, but you posted it. Why do people need to see your negative opinion as the first post? That was pretty lame, in my book. You're not just some guy on the Interwebz when you top-post a fund-raising article with a disparaging comment, you're a negative nancy with some say in the outcome.
BTW, of course "tap" for "trap" was a typo, as you can read in my post there are several other occurences of the word "trap" spelled correctly. Your suggestion that I might have been regurgitating your typo, as if I wouldn't know a "tap" from a "trap", is again an occassion where you are tripping over ego.
Yup, I'm looking at eight 10gig Ethernet cables.
WUT? Have you considered, oh, I dunno, PCI Express x16? They do make extension cables for that, to get outside the chassis.
"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe