Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Meh (Score 1) 120

Ok, what is the difference between Stalinist Russia and post-WW2 Sweden? Both are left. Is Sweden "moderate" left? And thus more "right"? Because you can't get more economic "left" than Communist Russia, can you? Then again, an absolutist government like Stalin's is actually more something you'd attribute to the "far right", along with the leader cult and all. Not unlike Hitler, Franco or Mao. No wait, that last one was "left", right? Where does Gandhi fit into it all? Is he "left"? Where would the likes of ISIS be located? Right wing? They would sure fit the anti-democratic, conservative picture, in the most extreme way. But they didn't strike me as the economic laissez-faire type. So are they left? Where do they fit in?

Politics is way more complicated than a simple binary system could represent.

Comment Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. (Score 1) 150

Yes, I've read that. In the end what remains is that Google, and only Google, will get a say in what is going to be considered "permitted ads" in Chrome and what isn't. That requires trusting them. And so far I am sorry to say it but Google is not a company I would put my trust in. I prefer to trust an ad blocker that simply disables all ads, mostly because I know why Google created this ad filter in the first place.

Comment Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. (Score 1) 150

Google gets to define what is an "acceptable" ad and what isn't. I don't doubt that they actually have an interest to weed out the most obnoxious ones simply to keep people from installing adblockers that shut out every ad, but since there are hardly any hard guidelines to follow, it basically comes down to "whatever Google deems bad".

And unless you can name a different motivator for a corporation than money, I'd like to hear it.

If it's for mobile, fine, implement it in the mobile browser. I can't argue whether it's useful in a mobile environment because I'm old enough that watching videos on a screen the size of a few stamps isn't a worthwhile endeavor for me anymore unless I have a decent magnifying lens with me. I cannot see a sensible application on a desktop, though. If you want to have a second window playing a video, the technology is already there. With total control over whether, where and how long this window is going to be open and playing that video.

Comment Did Intel confirm it? (Score 3, Funny) 184

We have a Chinese retailer claiming to sell a 10nm CPU that has the features (and probably speed) of a 5 year old low budget processor. And since Chinese companies have a spotless track record of never trying to sell counterfeited products, we should readily believe that this seemingly ancient CPU is bleeding edge.

I ... erh... well... how do you put it nicely...

Slashdot Top Deals

Q: How many IBM CPU's does it take to execute a job? A: Four; three to hold it down, and one to rip its head off.

Working...