Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Whether you choose to claim your pocket money (Score 1) 57

The thing is, this is a settlement of a class action lawsuit, not a guilty verdict against Google. In fact, under the terms of the settlement, Google specifically declines to admit to wrongdoing of any kind, and there is NO legal "verdict" against it.

This is "go-away" money, nothing more. The only reason it requires a court to approve it is that, under the original settlement - which an anti-class-action plaintiff successfully sued to void - Google would have had to pay only $7 million, split between the plaintiff attorneys and a group of consumer privacy advocate organizations.

The court agreed that the majority of the settlement should have gone to members of the class, rather than exclusively to privacy advocate organizations, and it ordered the parties to negotiate a new settlement reflecting that. Google agreed to raise the total settlement to $23 million under the new terms, and the Kroll Law Firm is handling registration of individual claimants to that shared pool of money.

Both sides will return to court in October, when the judge will decide if the currently-proposed settlement fulfills the guidelines he set forth, and authorizes disbursement of the funds.

Once again, Google has NOT admitted any wrongdoing in this case, so there is NO verdict in that regard. There is only a deal between Google and the Kroll Law Firm, acting on behalf of members of the class.

Oh, and in order to legally object to the current terms of the settlement, or to opt out of the lawsuit altogether (in order to preserve your right to sue Google seperately), you HAVE to register as a class member on the Kroll Law Firm's settlement site (link in TFS above).

Oh, and just to slather this legal shitcake with diarrhea frosting, it appears as though the Kroll web form only works with Chrome ...

Comment Re:Never finishing your government project (Score 3, Interesting) 157

backslashdot stated:

The govt. has cancelled big project before such as Superconducting Supercollider and VentureStar. Heck they even cancelled the DC-X after one lousy setback (luckily Masten Aerospace/SpaceX/Blue Origin etc. continued its legacy).

Both of those were USA ventures, where laying off staff is simple and inexpensive. ITER, by contrast, is headquartered in France, whose employment laws require two years of the full salaries and benefits of laid-off personnel to be funded - in advance - at their termination. Considering ITER's gigantic, well-paid staff, shutting it down would cost several billion euros in severance costs alone. And that's in addition to the price tag for mothballing the existing physical plant, paying off the cancellation fees for terminating all the vendor contracts without just cause, and all the other financial obligations that unwinding an international consortium's mega-project entail under EU regulations.

To put it another way: you're comparing apples with pomegranetes ...

Comment Re:Early scripts (Score 4, Informative) 53

AmiMoJo mused:

Apparently the early scripts were very different to the finished movie. There were whole sections removed, stuff that would have made it feel very different. I can see why he might have wondered if it was a send up or not.

Hammil provides some additional insight on that in this YT clip.

From context, it was Lucas' clunky, exposition-laden dialogue that confused him in the audition. "People don't talk like this!" was his reaction to the stuff the original script had Skywalker saying ...

Comment Re:Why is it connected to the net? (Score 4, Interesting) 23

278MorkandMindy inquired:

Why does a plastic moulding factory need to have anything that can stop production connected directly to the internet?

If the situation in Japan is anything like it is in the U.S., it's because the plant operators demand to have access to the Internet while they're doing their incredibly boring jobs, and management insists on giving it to them to keep them happy and productive. Sure, it's a stupidly risky thing to do, and yes, any responsible production automation designer will loudly insist it's a Very Bad Idea - but management the world over is blindly resistant to being educated about network security, because MBA schools taught them that IT is a cost center, not a profit center.

My source for the above is a close personal friend who retired last year after spending 40 years in the production process automation game - 30 of them as the owner of his own firm. He's regaled me many times over the years about the stubborn insistence of his clients on making their operators happy by giving their plant control workstations Internet access over his carefully-reasoned objections.

In the end, he was forced to give in, because, no matter how self-sabotagingly stupid he may be, the customer is always right ...

Comment The BS factor is strong in this one ... (Score 1) 123

If the study itself is as deeply flawed as the summary, you can file this one round.

The thing that immediately struck me was how the summary conflates grams of alcohol with grams of a particular beverage. It speaks of the harmful effects of 45 grams/day of alcohol on men, then talks about the number of grams of a "typical wine pour," etc. as though those were the same thing. 12 ounces of typical American beer contains about half an ounce of alcohol, for instance. For wine, it varies considerably from one varietal to another. And even for hard liquor, the proof (which is double the percentage of alcohol) of a given ounce can be anywhere from 60 to as much as 180.

This so-called meta-study is 100-proof junk science, and is utterly devoid of credibility.

(FWIW, I personally drink about one 12-ounce beer per month. Of course, the beer I drink is DuClaw Brewery's Sweet Baby Java Porter, so it bears zero resemblance to Budweiser or - shudder - the lightly-adulterated water that is Coors ... )

Comment RSPCA flack cries, "Wolf!" (Score 4, Insightful) 39

David Bowles, the RSPCA's mouthpiece, horripilates, "We do not believe this act should include animals, whether they are farm, pet or wildlife. Invasive procedures are needed to create each line of gene-edited mammals, there is no history of use for this powerful technology, and it can cause unintended changes to the genome, with unpredictable effects."

"Invasive procedures" (i.e. gene editing) is a deliberate misrepresentation. Invasive to individual cells? Okay, I'll buy that. But his invidious phrasing is meant to rile the pearl-clutchers with mental images of fiendishly cackling mad scientists going full Mengele on helpless, baby critters.

Even more dishonest is his accusation that there is "no history of use for this powerful technology." How, exactly, do you establish a "history of use" without actually using "this powerful technology?" You don't, because you can't. It's exactly like saying "there is no history of use of heavier-than-air flight technology in 1903," so the Wright Flyer and all subsequent iterations of "this powerful technology" should be a priori outlawed.

As for "this technology" being capable of causing "unintended changes to the genome, with unpredictable effects," that's what laboratory experiments and field trials are for. But, of course, Bowles' hand-waving is meant to panic the technologically ignorant, not to inform them.

The RSPCA's Luddism has inflicted all kinds of damage on British farmers over the years, and this press release is intended to do additional, preemptive harm in the dubious service of a slippery slope argument that, because the policy does not specifically bar the use of gene editing on the cats, dogs, and budgies that Brits are mad for, it will inevitably result in the creation of horrific, mutant monsters, available at your local pet store tomorrow.

Won't somebody please think of the puppies ... ?

Comment Re:Danny Elfman did it too? (Score 1) 244

destinyland noted:

For his Oompa Loompa songs in Tim Burton's 2005 movie Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Danny Elfman himself trimmed down Roald Dahl's original lyrics.

Of course he did, Dave. If he'd've incorporated all the original lyrics, the song would've been five minutes long - six, with tuba solo. It would've brought the movie to a screeching, grinding, clattering halt for no defensible reason.

It's the same reason Peter Jackson chose to leave the Tom Bombadil song (and Tom Bombadil himself) out of The Fellowship of the Ring movie ...

Comment Dinosaur Comics! (Score 2) 24

I love Dinosaur Comics. It's right up there with Bizarro and Zippy the Pinhead on my daily must-read list (a list which would also include Basic Instructions, if only Scott Meyer would do more than one panel a week).

Is it for everyone? No. To enjoy it, you need a sense of the absurd, a decent education, and a taste for cringe humor, because T. Rex (the main character) is such an oblivious narcissist. (Oh, and, despite the occasional off-screen appearance by both god and the devil, it helps to be a secular humanist. Or at least to believe in evolution, and science, and stuff.) And you have to be willing to discard your prejudice against seeing the exact same artwork repeated endlessly, strip after strip, in favor of seeing it as a reliable framework for the dialogue, which is consistently inventive, amusing, and insightful.

Although it's unlikely I'll still be around to enjoy it, I, too, hope Ryan North will still be penning the strip 40 years from now ...

Comment Re: EV's are good in areas with reliable power gri (Score 2) 453

RazorSharp blathered:

Rural areas usually lack natural gas so houses are heated with electric heat pumps and water heaters. Having a reliable power grid is just as important outside the city as inside.

I've lived in the country for a couple of decades. In forested areas, the overwhelming choice for home heating is wood stoves. In grasslands, it's propane.

Heat pumps have become increasingly popular in recent years, but they don't work when the power goes out. Wood stoves and propane, however, do ...

Comment SpaceX Crew Dragon (Score 2) 61

According to Wikipedia, the SpaceX Crew Dragon, by default, is configured to carry up to four passengers, but it can be reconfigured to carry as many as seven.

So it's clearly feasible to send one, with a pilot aboard, to return three passengers to Earth. The problem, if any, will be Russia's willingness to allow its cosmonauts to touch down in American waters, rather than on the steppes of Kazakhstan ...

Comment The WSJ article minus the Apple garbage characters (Score 3) 47

A startup backed by an internet-search pioneer wants to give cash to users who share personal data including what they buy or watch on mobile apps.

The startup, Caden Inc., operates an app by the same name that helps users download their data from apps and services—whether that’s Amazon.com Inc. or Airbnb Inc. —into a personal “vault.” Users who consent to share that data for advertising purposes can earn a cut of the revenue that the app generates from it. They also can access personal analytics based on that data.

The idea of giving consumers a cut of whatever brands might pay to reach them isn’t new, but it has been reinvigorated as outside companies have found it harder to harvest and share so-called third-party data. The digital ad industry has been seeking new sources of the consumer data that guides online marketing efforts as traditional tracking techniques have come under pressure. A new Apple policy last year requires apps to ask permission to track users, for example, permission that many people have declined to give.

Caden, which has been testing with a limited group of users, plans to begin a public beta test of 10,000 users early next year. The company last month closed a $6 million round of funding led by seed-stage venture-capital firm Streamlined Ventures and including Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang through his venture firm AME Cloud Ventures.

“The team is uniquely focused on trying to solve one of the dilemmas of the internet: the exchange of consumer data for ‘free access’ to services, apps, and websites,” Mr. Yang said. Consumers have typically had little or no control over how their data is collected and who it is sold to, he said.

Caden will give consumers a range of choices about sharing their data, including how it is shared and for what purpose, it said.

One option in the public beta test will anonymize and pool the data before sharing it with outside parties in exchange for $5 to $20 a month, according to Caden founder and Chief Executive John Roa. The amount of compensation will be determined by a “data score” reflecting factors such as whether consumers answer demographic survey questions and which apps and services’ data consumers are sharing.

Consumers will eventually be given the option to share more specific information for more tailored advertising. A marketer could then form audience segments and tailor their ad targeting and messaging to those groups. For instance, a user could consent to sharing his ride-share history so advertisers could create segments of people who ride a certain amount. That would eventually pay consumers up to $50 a month, Caden said.

A third option would let advertisers take a direct action based on the data that Caden understands about a specific user. If a consumer were part of a department store’s loyalty program, for example, the store might reward her for sharing her individual Amazon shopping history and use it to provide more personalized offers.That could generate thousands of dollars a year for participating users, the company said.

Caden also hopes that the data it can aggregate will be compelling for consumers. Users could search for restaurants they’ve eaten at in a certain city, for instance, or how much they spent in certain categories across different apps, executives said.

“It’s like Spotify Wrapped for your whole life,” said Amarachi Miller, Caden’s head of product, referring to the streaming music service’s year-end distillation of each user’s listening.

Mr. Miller said two early groups that have shown interest in the app have included tech early adopters and couponers, a group of consumers that are savvy about rebates and deals, who hope to use the app as a passive income tool.

But any app that’s successful in the space will need to win over all sorts of consumers and keep them coming back in order to give marketers a compelling amount of data, said Ullas Naik, founder and general partner at Streamlined Ventures, the lead on the new funding round.

“The consumer app is going to have to be incredible. Not only the user experience, but also the value that the consumer gets is going to have to be amazing,” Mr. Naik said.He said his firm has looked at many companies attempting this in the past, but believes Caden is furthest along in putting it all together.

Caden is trying to crack into a nascent business with plenty of competitors, said Forrester Research Inc. analyst Stephanie Liu. Other companies in the space include CitizenMe Ltd., which lets consumers gather their own data and exchange it for money or rewards, according to its website.

Success will require not only wide adoption by consumers and advertisers but also trust from consumers, Ms. Liu said. She said if consumers’ data is used in ways they don’t expect, they could be turned off and abandon such platforms. She said companies must do what they can to retain consumer trust and ensure advertisers don’t breach that trust.

Caden said it will initially sell only anonymized and aggregated data that doesn’t tie back to individuals. As it starts to let brands do more personal promotions for users, it said it will let users see which brands and partners it’s working with, and will let users control which brands can access their information. For instance, a consumer would be able to see that they’re represented as someone who streamed a horror film in the past 30 days. They’d also be able to limit or restrict advertisers by a category or by name.

Caden’s plan to let consumers choose which brands they share with, and what kinds of information brands get, could be a differentiator, according to Ms. Liu. Some other players that offer compensation for data have required consumers share their entire profile with all brands.

But Ms. Liu also said she believes the space isn’t likely to see mainstream success until another privacy shift—Google’s plan to stop supporting third-party tracking in its Chrome browser—takes effect no sooner than 2024. Brands for now can still collect much of the information about consumers that these services are asking users to consent to share on their own, she said.

“I think these will be a series of niche solutions, something advertisers can experiment with and something consumers can experiment with, but I don’t see them taking off,” she said.

Write to Megan Graham (the author of the article above) at megan.graham@wsj.

Slashdot Top Deals

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...