Of course most Americans simply follow one or two news sources. Those news sources being the ones that most accurately reflect their own opinions because they're more comfortable when they don't have said opinions challenged. So for the most part, those who feel the war is wrong and being run in a horrible manner will receive cherry picked sections confirming that belief. And those who feel that the war is justified, and even releasing this information is only putting American soldiers in danger will find equally cherry picked sections that confirm those beliefs. In the end relatively few people will be exposed to anything thought provoking to them.
And those that do will have cognitive dissonance, write it off and not think about it again.
Frankly, if nothing else it will help America have some idea as to what is happening, and that there is a war going on.
You would hope but how many Americans actually know about Wikileaks?
seems to favors special effects over storyline!
Well yea, it is cheaper and easier to blow something up compared to writing something good. It is also easier to sell a 5 sec clip of special effects then a 5 sec clip of storyline. It would also say that it is harder to appreciate special effects with really crappy resolution while the story usually doesn't suffer.
Wow, you've even lost a vowel.
Se I tol yo Civ wa dangerou
I, uh, imagine that when they find an unlicensed pool on Google Earth, and send somebody to tell you, he does, uh, a quick peek around back to make sure the pool is actually still there before he knocks on the door.
Get real! This is the government we are talking about. You get the fine in the mail and then have to fight it to prove that the pool is no longer there. There is no actual going to the houses anymore.
Very true. It is good to see a company that plans for the long term and I applaud their R&D spending and holding onto something because it might be useful in the future. However I have to ask, if this process and glass is 60 years old shouldn't the patent have run out quite a while ago? Shouldn't we have been seeing this before now in uses that Corning couldn't think of?
If all else fails, lower your standards.