Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Apple has to step up their game. (Score 2) 427

Malware is a numbers game. Windows used to be the main player by a much larger margin and criminals knew that code over a poor or rare windows exploit generally infected far more computers than even some of the worst mac exploits.

As Mac OS gains more and more users (and similarly any other platform like IOS, Android, and *gasp* Linux) they become more and more vulnerable because rarer and rarer exploits still result in powerful botnets.

Apple has never been "virus proof," they just never had the numbers to make a lot of exploits worth the coding time.

Comment Re:bullshit (Score 1) 61

You missed an option
-interkin3tic is a Slashdot troll who has no idea that a patent application is not a patent.

The article specifically points out this is a patent application and with that status comes no legal protection of any sort. The case either has yet to be reviewed or is in the process of being reviewed by anyone at the USPTO. It is only the applicant at this point who shows broad ignorance of iphoto or other similar tagging applications. This application will most likely be shot down or highly modified and limited if it does ever issue as a patent.

Comment Re:A global remote kill switch in our computers (Score 5, Interesting) 399

I'm sure the virus writers are rubbing their hands with glee waiting to get their hands on one of these chips.

Actually, Kill-switch based malware is much less valuable in reality than other types of hacks. If this were a server processor, I could see the value in an enhanced remote server-kill. Because these are basic home-use processors though, remote kill viruses probably won't get much farther than proof-of-concept.

Botnets are much more lucrative in the malware world - processor uptime is much more valuable than processor downtime.

Comment Re:The lone red dot remaining in the Sick & Po (Score 1) 270

You're almost certainly correct about that; I should have been clearer. Rosling wasn't gathering the data, just presenting it.

I was just surprised to hear North Korea's life expectancy estimated so high.

Ahh - cheers mate, I was also quite surprised.

Thought that was the argumentative standpoint, but after a re-read and the above comment it's clearly not.

I actually wouldn't be terribly surprised if both the income and life expectancy are off. Most countries have an average income that's 2/3rds of their per-capita GDP (which can more accurately be measured by exports) considering South Korea's Per-capita GDP is $1,900, the actual average income is more likely to be closer to $1,250 (not that it is guaranteed to be)

So yes, there are very likely some serious discrepancies with countries like South Korea that view the rest of the world as enemies.

Comment Re:The lone red dot remaining in the Sick & Po (Score 2) 270

While that may be true, do you think this graph was made off of a census specifically sanctioned within the borders of North Korea by Hans Rosling himself, or do you think he's going by existing census and income information?!

I'm not saying the data is correct, I'm saying that dot in the lower left quadrant of the graph is Afghanistan and not North Korea.

Comment Re:The lone red dot remaining in the Sick & Po (Score 1) 270

Is the lone red dot remaining in the Sick & Poor quadrant North Korea by chance?

Actually no, it isn't

Given that North Korea has an average life expectancy of 63.8 and a per-capita income of $1,700, that would put it solidly above the 50 year line. The North Korea dot is most likely the one slightly above and to the left of India.

Slashdot Top Deals

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...