Comment Re:Theft? (Score 1) 268
When I was a kid I went through the whole hacker stage using the childish excuse "We help people by highlighting vulnerabilities", this excuse does not hold water either legally or ethically.
Educate yourself:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
A hacker isn't somebody who breaks into other machines maliciously. But some who break into systems DO take the moral high ground by getting into the system and leaving information for the administrator about what vulnerability was open and how to secure it without defacing the site.
I hope this unethical behaviour goes on their academic transcript.
What's so unethical? This is like if somebody put a sign in front of an open building that says "please write on the walls", you leave your building for a year or two and nobody has written on it except a bunch of guys who are using the wall to pass encoded messages to each other. If you don't like what they wrote, erase it, tell them they can't do it anymore. Chances are, they'll go find somebody else's open building rather than further piss you off.
What the students did was they just stopped writing on anybody's walls because they were pressured by the university. Maybe what they did annoyed some people, as it was not what the site owners were expecting, but you can't really complain too hard about the situation being "unethical" all things considered. They used the site for what it was made for in an unexpected way.
In addition, most of these abandoned sites are COVERED in spam messages because the admins didn't properly secure against bots posting viagra ads from top to bottom. Can you really blame the grad students for saying, going back to our analogy "hey, this guy just has ads for penis enlargement all over his wall, he probably won't mind if we start passing messages to each other..."? Get off your high horse. The backlash here is well within the site owners rights, but I don't think there should be consequences other than having to stop the project.