Well that's embarrassing, I got mixed up half way down my list as to which device was which device. Its easy to only list the biggest differences that make the netbook look nice. I'm guessing you're talking about the MSI Wind. 1.6 pounds vs. 3 pounds Ability to use while you hold it in your hand vs. requiring your computer to be in your lap 9.56" x 7.47" x 0.5" v. 10.24" x 7.09" x 0.75" - 1.24" 3G vs. vs. 3G 10 hour battery (no listed reviews yet) vs. 14 hour battery (7.5 listed on review site) 1024x768 resolution vs. 1024x600 resolution The jury is still out on usability and that will be one of the most important differentiators. Sure this doesn't tilt things squarely in the iPad's favor but if you're just going to compare processing power and price you might as well throw your smart phone away and buy a netbook.

Its easy to only list the biggest differences that make the netbook look nice. I'm guessing you're talking about the MSI Wind.

1.6 pounds vs. 3 pounds
Ability to use while you hold it in your hand vs. requiring your computer to be in your lap
10.24" x 7.09" x 0.75" - 1.24" vs. 9.56" x 7.47" x 0.5"
No 3G vs. 3G
14 hour battery (7.5 listed on review site) vs. 10 hour battery (no listed reviews yet)
1024x600 resolution vs. 1024x768 resolution

The jury is still out on usability and that will be one of the most important differentiators.

Sure this doesn't tilt things squarely in the iPad's favor but if you're just going to compare processing power and price you might as well throw your smart phone away and buy a netbook.

The poster probably doesn't want to have to learn keybindings for a new editor. He may even already know them but just prefers vim keybindings. What he really probably wants is the luxuries of of a full IDE without having to give up the editing flexibility and familiarity he has with vim.

Star Trek operates in a multiverse. What was altered was a different timeline meaning that all of the existing Star Trek cannon is not invalidated.

Why is it so hard for EA to understand why people are upset about an install limit? It is not at all uncommon to install a computer game at least five or ten times. There are plenty of instances where people will even install their games more often for perfectly legitimate reasons. Yes, it would be nice to not need a crack to play without the disk, but what good is that if 5 installs later I can't even play the game. It is completely unacceptable to be required to call EA and beg to be able to play what I payed for. I read an EA employee's comment that said something along the lines of Spore has only had a very small number of people need more than 3 installs. I think they're missing the point. If your game hasn't even been out a year and you already have people hitting their limit, then that should be a clue that you don't have a long term solution. Saying, "our bad, we'll update it to a max of 5 installs and you can negotiate with us for more on a case by case basis" is like trying to fix a hole in the space shuttle's insulating tiles with a layer of duct tape.