Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
China

Submission + - China Erases New Internet Rumors, Shuts Down Sites (itworld.com)

itwbennett writes: "Chinese officials said Thursday that http://www.itworld.com/internet/267566/china-scrubs-online-rumors-internet-shuts-down-sites">210,000 online posts and 42 websites have been taken down since mid-March in a government crackdown on rumors. In addition, 6 people were detained for allegedly fabricating rumors saying that military vehicles were in Beijing and that the city was in trouble."
The Military

Submission + - Study: Macho Men likely to become Right-Wingers Politically (dailymail.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: A study by Griffith University in Australia has concluded that men who could be described as "Macho" — physically fit and possessed of a muscular upper body — are likely to become right-wing conservatives in terms of political alignment. The study found that upper body strength influences various "mental mechanisms" used in decision making, and attributes this influence to evolutionary "survival mechanisms" that kept hunter-gatherers alive and fed thousands of years ago. In the study, men with great upper body strength were more likely to become angry quickly, more likely to solve "problem situations" with aggression, more likely to feel "entitled" to various things, and — surprise surprise — far more likely to support agressive military action to solve problems like Iraq, Afghanistan, than the average person. The study concluded that "Macho" men were more likely to believe in the ‘utility of political aggression’ to solve conflict, than ordinary men. In the case of America, "Macho" males were found to be far more likely to back right-wing conservative Republican party doctrines, than to support left-wing liberal Democratic Party doctrines.

Comment Re:Well then are better then text book in some way (Score 1) 223

They're not blaming autism on the vaccines, because they'd get slapped with lawsuits for threatening pharmaceutical company profits, although that's probably what's causing the epidemic. I worked for a school district as a computer programmer, and I had to write a program to determine whether or not a child had the right mix of vaccines based on State of Michigan data. I was stunned that children had to receive so many vaccines at such a young age.
Apple

Submission + - Apple Tried to Hire Linus Torvalds, Kill Linux (omgubuntu.co.uk)

butilikethecookie writes: The founder of Linux was invited to Apple HQ in Cupertino by Steve Jobs at the turn of the millennium, where is was invited to join Apple and work on (what would become) OS X. The lure? ‘Unix for the biggest user base’.The catch? That he would have to stop development on Linux, a condition that led Torvalds to flatly refuse the offer. Imagine: no Linux would have meant no Ubuntu, no Chrome OS, and no Android; the entire ecosystem of technology could have been dramatically changed by acceptance of this one job offer.
Earth

Submission + - CO2 in the Atmosphere Makes You Fat (greencarreports.com)

thecarchik writes: Carbon footprints are a big talking point at the moment — they're your personal contribution to greenhouse gases, usually in terms of carbon dioxide, or CO2 emissions.

he theory is due to the hormones in the brain responsible for "wakefulness", or the amount of time we spend awake. CO2 levels can affect these hormones, leading us to go to bed later, which affects our metabolism making it easier for us to gain weight.

Carbon doesn't just affect the atmosphere, it also makes us eat. Breathing in increased CO2 makes our blood more acidic, affecting our brain patterns, making us want to eat more.

If that still sounds perculiar, consider that a study conducted in 2010 has also seen the same effects in different species of animal — so it's not just the proliferation of fast food restaurants leading to humans piling on the pounds.

Comment Re:TSA procedures are largely symbolic (Score 1) 601

Getting a bomb on a plane isn't a problem even with the cancer scanners. I highly doubt that the burger flippers at the airport McDonald's outlet has to go through the same security restrictions that we do, because their hair would start falling out before their first year was up from all the x-ray zapping. You just have Muhammad go through security without the bomb, pick up a C-4 Big Mac, and get his 72 virgins that way, and the TSA would be none the wiser.
Security

Submission + - 10 Physical IT Security Problems That Will Hurt You (hp.com)

Esther Schindler writes: "The easiest physical IT security problem to understand is theft. But there are at least nine more ways for the bad guys to get in – and to make you weep. In 10 Physical IT Security Problems That Will Hurt You, Tom Henderson shares several stories with lessons about preventing new paths to the unemployment line. Among them: The Boss Thinks He Can Push Any Button; Mind Your Devices; Test Yourself.

Tom writes with humor as well as decades of experience. For instance:

Take the case of the hotshot engineer, who decides after the performance review that his employer sucks, and he’s “out-of-here.” He storms out of his review interview and his job, simultaneously. One call might kill all of his access or not. Are all locations immediately updated? Is access to all assets and locales killed immediately? If not, Stormin’ Norman might be damage control looking for a spot marked X.

"

Comment Re:Supremacy Clause (Score 2, Insightful) 601

You can talk all you want about the the Supremacy Clause and other nuances, but the primary objection against the TSA has been about violations of the 4th amendment, forceably requiring what amounts to, in any other context, as sexual assault as a condition to board an airplane, or forcing people to go through a scanner that uses radiative energy that has been scientifically proven to increase cancer risk.

The TSA is no more entitled to feel up airline passengers than they are to shoot every 200th passenger in the head. The Feds cannot mandate that the TSA break the laws of the states.

Ultimately, this will be a PR battle. Any sheriff would be fully within his right to arrest TSA agents for what they do daily as a condition of their job. If the states wanted to force a change in TSA policy, all they would have to do is have the governor whisper into a sheriff's ear and, after a few TSA agents are arrested at the airport, let the TSA try to bail them out of jail and justify their policy in the court of public opinion. The state would win the PR war and the Feds would look like goons that they are

Security

Submission + - State Legislatures Attempt to Limit TSA Searches (thenewamerican.com) 1

OverTheGeicoE writes: Here's a familiar story: a breast cancer survivor's mastectomy scars showed up on a TSA scan, which forced a horrifying pat-down ('feel-up' in her words) of the affected area. The woman decided that she would not subject herself to that again, and was barred from a later flight from Seattle to Juneau for that reason. But now the story takes an interesting turn: the woman is Alaska State Rep. Sharon Cissna, and once she finally made it back to Alaska she started sponsoring legislation to restrict TSA searches. Her many bills, if passed, would criminalize both pat-downs and 'naked scanning,' as well as require better health warnings for X-ray scanners and even studies of airport screenings' physical and psychological effects. Other states, including Utah and Texas, are considering similar legislation. For example, Texas State Rep. David Simpson is preparing to reintroduce his Traveler Dignity Act again in 2013 if he is re-elected. The last time that bill was being considered the Federal government threatened to turn all of Texas into a 'no-fly zone'.
Security

Submission + - Apple's Gatekeeper May Be Beginning of OSX App Restrictions (threatpost.com)

Trailrunner7 writes: Context is a funny thing. In most segments of society, Apple is seen as an exemplary company, with an unrivaled record of innovation, much-admired ad campaigns and a stock price that is the envy of every company not named Google. But in the security community, Apple is regarded with some combination of disbelief, confusion and the disdain that once was reserved for Microsoft.

There have been some signs in the last couple of years, however, that Apple is putting more emphasis on security, at least in some areas. The iPhone has been the mobile platform most resistant to attack thus far, thanks to the inclusion of some anti-exploit technologies and a sandbox in iOS. But much of that success can be attributed to Apple's philosophy of only allowing apps from the App Store to run on iPhones and reviewing each of those apps before it's allowed inside the fence. That policy can be seen in one of two ways: as a method for preventing malicious apps showing up on users' phones; or as a method for locking users into the Apple hardware-software ecosystem.

The next step for Apple with the Mac App Store could well be for it to move in this same direction, restricting the software on Macs to only those apps that have come from the app store. Apple has not said anything like this publicly, nor are they likely to, unless and until the decision is finalized. But it's entirely possible that Gatekeeper is the prelude to such a move, and it likely would be a good one for users, in terms of security. Protecting users from themselves is important.

Slashdot Top Deals

Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated. -- R. Drabek

Working...