Why. why do you automatically think that maybe this represents intention? Have you ever seen people throw darts at pictures of their bosses? Is your first thought "I better find out if this represents novelty of intention?"

Look at what? When I was a kid we used to run around and shoot each other with rubber band guns and dart guns. Shoot I used to run a game of "assassin" in high school. Should we be investigated? No, we were just kids. Based on the story in the article, this kid did NOTHING to warrant a second thought (other than perhaps "hey, is there a problem and do you need help."

TFA: "arrested for terrorizing and interference of the operation of a school."
He didn't terrorize anyone. And I'm not sure how he interfered with the operation of the school. The article doesn't indicate this, but my guess is, he didn't actually interfere with the operation of the school.

Uhm ok... No ACTUAL weapons were used in the making of this story. So what does the fact it is easier for kids to illegally obtain them have to do with anything? Because the kid MIGHT get a weapon? That isn't a good enough reason to arrest him. So really the "right to bear arms" "crap" has nothing to do with this story.

There seems to be a market for quality recordings http://www.npr.org/blogs/therecord/2013/09/11/219727031/what-does-a-song-that-costs-5-sound-like

FTS: "the monster trucks of the DVR world"
But the title is "Monster Truck of Tivos"
Why? Why do we have to use Tivo as a synonym for DVR, can't we just say DVR?

There are better ways to study traffic patters, than to look for only SOME of the vehicles. Like you know maybe studying ALL the vehicles, like pretty much any other metropolis does.

That is only because they didn't listen to their constituents. Everyone ELSE knew what the impact would be, except for the people passing the law.

The purpose of TSA is safety: "Protect the Nation's transportation systems to ensure freedom of movement for people and commerce."
So it is to stop someone from blowing the plane up, as well as stop them from hijacking a plane and flying it into a building. Keep in mind that TSA's mission is NOT specific to air flight!

Anyone can estimate it, it is very very very close to 0.

The same way everything else in the airport is broken up by airline, as I'm sure it was done before 9/11. Or better yet, don't do any security at all!
There are airports in Europe that have security at the gate, and these are awful. Not only does it not help to get there early, as the gate doesn't open up until a certain time, there is generally no facilities after the checkpoint. No food, no water, no toilets (not always, some have toilets and vending machines)

This is the problem really. Flying is one of the safest ways to travel. After 9/11 more people drove to their destination and traffic deaths went up.

When you have a suspect, or a witness... But when you don't have a suspect, who do you look for?

That is the wrong kind of profiling, and doesn't work. Profiling is supposed to based on how the person is acting. The problem is, well its acting, and people can control how they act.

Profiling is a horrible crime. Profiling based on something stupid like race doesn't work anymore than the current situation works. Profiling based on anything else can be tricked. But what exactly are we worried about? What is it we are afraid of?

She said "The thing is, we lost and if you don't comply it's treason." In other words, it is treasonous not to cooperate. Sounds like the headline is spot on.