Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Who? (Score 1) 701

there is absolutely no possibility whatsoever of becoming even barely acquainted with anything remotely related with any field of modern philosophy without not only hearing of, but knowing who is, and hopefully directly reading, kant.

and he is called Immanuel.

Submission + - Total victory for open source software in a patent (opensource.com)

AndGodSed writes: A really great article on a jury victory 3rd of May by Red Hat and Novell: The jury verdict last Friday in favor of Red Hat and Novell in a case based on bad software patents owned by "non-practicing entities" is an important victory for the open source community...we know that attacks on open source based on FUD will not stand up when subjected to the light of truth.

Comment Re:Oh dear (Score 1) 281

you are expecting people to behave rationally when it suits your anti-labour argument that workers are going to under perform in order to avoid paying training, but assume that they won't behave rationally when considering mikechant's reasonable argument of why your rational underperforming workers shouldn't do it.

looks like a true scotsman to me, ergo, fallacious. you loose the argument.

NEXT!
Space

Super-Earths Discovered Orbiting Nearby, Sun-Like Star 242

likuidkewl writes "Two super-earths, 5 and 7.5 times the size of our home, were found to be orbiting 61 Virginis a mere 28 light years away. 'These detections indicate that low-mass planets are quite common around nearby stars. The discovery of potentially habitable nearby worlds may be just a few years away,' said Steven Vogt, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC. Among hundreds of our nearest stellar neighbors, 61 Vir stands out as being the most nearly similar to the Sun in terms of age, mass, and other essential properties."

Comment Re:Seems credible to me (Score 1) 198

well, since we lack a formal definition of "emergence", it is not so easy to measure. Sure, we can measure the appearance of a given phenomena previously determined to be "emergent", but we have no way of determining automatically what phenomena are in fact emergent, and which are just normal consequences of the design choices behind the game. Rocket Jumping, in FPS, for example... is it an "emergent" behaviour? Its emergence, depends only on it being included as a design choice or not?

If this is so, then anything not included in a precompiled list of possible behaviours and phenomena would be emergent.

Entropy is another thing, it can help measure order/disorder, and maybe the amount of "random stuff" happening, but to be an emergent phenomena ()in any relevant sense), it has to be interesting to an observer (or, in context, it has to be "fun"), and that criteria is not formally state-able (is that a word!? IANA Native English Speaker), at least as far as i know...

Would love to hear comments on formal definitions of emergence, specifically if it applies to providing a formal criteria to identify it.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...