One big question is the sourcing of cobalt. Right now much of this comes from Africa and Asia and things are getting a bit volatile in these places which could impact future trade. Use of LFP as an alternative to battery chemistry with cobalt can mitigate against this but that leaves lithium.
There are multiple alternatives to cobalt. The LFP is one, but nickel is proving to be not only a viable replacement for cobalt in current lithium batteries, but actually superior. So even in the medium term, much less the long one, there is no "cobalt" problem.
Lithium has it's own problems on producing enough now, and some of the places it comes from now have their own political volatility that could impact existing mining.
Could this argument be any vaguer? With any commodity with rapidly expanding demand there are always transient supply pinches, and so observing that we have seen some is not any sort of argument against the viability of lithium batteries, and is not even a price problem for BEVs not even in the short term since they use so little (12 kg in a high end Tesla). Lithium supply does not have any significant "political volatility" (aka Africa) supply problems - probably why you did not name any names. Less than 1% of world supply comes from Africa in 2022, Australia and Chile currently produce 77% of the entire supply. And there is no long term problem either - current known resources is enough to build 9 billion Teslas, and it is expanding rapidly as more exploration is done.
If lithium and/or cobalt supplies dry up then that will impact BEV prices.
Fairies will make our lithium disappear? Cobalt supply is adequate for the foreseeable future and is on the way out, as you yourself noted above (though you were unaware of nickel replacing cobalt also. By the same token if the fairies stole all of our uranium the nuclear power industry would collapse.
Another one of your long posts of unsupported FUD.