The probe started out at roughly our speed and accelerated to 34,471 mph, or about 15.4 km/s. In the absence of a complex acceleration history, the simple, first-order approximation of the probe's average speed over the last 6 years is about 7.7 km/s or about 2.6e-5 c. At that speed, the relativistic effect is about 0.99999999967015470011, meaning that the probe has aged about 62 milliseconds less than you have.

Oops! Sorry, Samantha but it seems even a biologist can just be plain wrong sometimes. (Don't mind me cuz I'm a biologist,too.) If pandas are marsupials I'll eat my hat...

I don't do a lot of editing of text over images, so this might be a stupid question, but couldn't you just add and position the image after you've done typing?

I don't know how to address this in other operating systems but, in GNOME on GNU/Linux, you can get around case 1 by checking the "Disable trackpad whilst typing" option.

I'm afraid this is just silly.

There is a very simple action that would invalidate the claims of atheists: that would be for a god, any god, to reveal himself in some obvious, unequivocal, unmistakable way. Like, pop up on the nightly news and heal an amputee or something.

The theists, on the other hand, are the ones making the unfalsifiable claims. They're the ones claiming that there exists a sky fairy who chooses to keep himself hidden from man and whose presence can only be intimated by reading an ancient book or books with the aid of some sort of secret decoder ring.

Please, put aside your rancour for a second and tell me, truthfully, which side is making a claim which cannot be falsified...

Oh, wait, you're an AC. I should have known better than respond because you're only here to make yourself feel like you're too good to be living in mommy's basement among piles of pizza boxes and soiled Kleenex.