Comment Re:we already have killer robots (Score 1) 318
I'd trust an AI over any incompetent human operator in that respect.
I'd trust an AI over any incompetent human operator in that respect.
like, eg., Predator drones?
The move from that to autonomy is mostly software...
> What a fucking babby.
how is linus formed
Also, most places that do use them internally (eg. the apt repositories) seem to only use the adjective and ditch the animal.
acting with such impunity, you can get in trouble with the law
...
We'd become xenophobic omnicidal recluses and have to be locked away in a time lock...
wait what? Is that a thing people do?
Is sharing targetting info useful enough to justify having to recharge your gun every X hours, and risk suffering a software crash every now and then? And what if your adversary intercepts all that valuable targetting info you are broadcasting, and now know exactly where all your guys are and where they are aiming?
Of course I do realize that the entire reason for this new weapons system is to at least get better rifles into the hands of the soldiers up there. I just don't think it'll ever get through the politicized purchasing process.
The entire reason for this new weapons system is to secure lucrative contracts for its manufacturers. If they wanted better rifles into the hands of the soldiers they would be looking into affordable tried and tested weaponry instead of new high tech ones that will almost inevitably lead to decades of expensive 'teething problems'.
Nuclear missile subs are second strike tools. The point is that supposing by some chance the enemy launches a surprise attack, knocking out all of your fixed land based silos. Then the subs will still be out there, ready to exact revenge.
Which is it, Deep Web or Darknet?
Excellent reporting there.
While his original idea has some sound points, the ideological militancy with which he pursues it does more harm to free software than good at this point. BSD-style licenses are not the enemy of free software.
Shunning BSD goes far beyond attacking non-free software; it's shunning free software proponents who don't shun non-free software. What's next, refusing to work with developers who also contribute to BSD projects? Refusing to work with developers who don't refuse to work with those developers? Take that far enough and you're basically on your own.
That's pretty optimistic for a centralized site that seems to do exactly what the Pirate Bay got shut down for...
"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe
