Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Two Different Thoughts (Score 1) 1657

I agree with you. However, I recall a few months ago reading that we're about to head into global cooling.

I do not doubt humans contribute, but volcanos and natural disasters (ie lightening fires) cause a lot more. What I don't agree with is government telling us that we must change and how we'll do it and if we don't they'll tax us etc. I don't know anyone, regardless of global warming, that doesn't want cheap clean energy and I don't know anyone who is willing to give up oil and pay more just to make a minute difference.

Private industry is working on a plethora of solutions and the government should stay the fuck away and let the people figure out the best solution. I certainly don't wan to drive through the hills of California and see windmill farms, they're ugly as all hell. I also don't want to cruise through the desert and see fields of solar panels or oil rigs. If it wasn't for the 60's hippies, we'd have more clean nuclear power like France. So you fucking liberals should keep finding what's polluting, but don't stop the private sector from coming up with solutions. In other words, stop trying to pass your tyrannical laws the inhibit growth and ingenuity and spend your time working on a real practical solutions. One that doesn't require a lot of handle holding or dirty people sitting in a circle singing kumbaya.

Comment Re:two ways to solve the tax "scam" (Score 1) 1505

Please be a bit clearer on your response. Small businesses pay a lot in taxes and are the largest employer in the United States. Big Business and multinational corporations are the ones that have the means to locate out of the US and avoid taxes. So why you might pat yourself on the back, don't throw all of us under the same rug.

Comment Re:Companies as competing Organisms (Score 5, Insightful) 361

Given the opportunity it is very hard for any person or company to pass up a chance to change the rules of a game in a way that disadvantages its competition in that game. This is especially true when survival is at stake. We do not and should never condone this type of behavior but we must realize it is natural and (without regard to morality) should be expected. This type behavior is bad for our industry as we have all seen so we must always be aware that some company out there will always try this as a means to advantage and stop it to allow strength to be generated via fierce competition.

It's bad for every industry. It's natural to be competitive and that's why morals and values are a good thing. Business is bad when the bottom line and being number 1 becomes more important than the product. At that point you've lost focus and have embraced greed. I'm a small business owner, but I learned from a great mentor that all deals should be win/win and you should never screw someone over to get ahead or you'll get a bad name. When I sell, I don't bad mouth competitors products and I tell the people who work for me not to either. Say a few positive things about the competition and then educate the merits of your product, if it's good it'll sell.

Being conservative I have to say that the Bush administration really let us down with the MS antitrust case. Not to mention other things, but I prefer to stay on topic.

Comment Re:Waiting.. (Score 1) 449

I know this may be unpopular, but I think we should have a patent system, but not the way it's implemented now.

I think patents should only protect companies with a small market cap and as they reach a specific size, they lose their patent. This would help protect small companies as they are getting started without larger companies with massive resources destroying them before they get off the ground. It should be based on industry and market cap.

I also believe companies that do not intend to produce products with their patents should be force to sell them or lose them. No patent trolls with ridiculous fees.

Censorship

Submission + - Comcast Blocks Some Internet Traffic (wired.com)

shelterpaw writes: Comcast seems to be getting a bit scary with their internet policies and practices. They don't disclose what they block and do not block when you sign up, unless it's buried in the fine print. Not only are they limiting traffic for bit torrent, but they limit it for VPN's unless you pay them $100 a month.

From the Article: Article Link "NEW YORK (AP) — Comcast Corp. actively interferes with attempts by some of its high-speed Internet subscribers to share files online, a move that runs counter to the tradition of treating all types of Net traffic equally."

"My concern is the precedent. In the past, when people got an ISP connection, they were getting a connection to the Internet. The only determination was price and bandwidth. Now they're going to have to make much more complicated decisions such as price, bandwidth, and what services I can get over the Internet." said Watson.

Several companies have sprung up that rely on peer-to-peer technology, including BitTorrent Inc., founded by the creator of the BitTorrent software (which exists in several versions freely distributed by different groups and companies).

Topolski agrees that Comcast has a right to manage its network and slow down traffic that affects other subscribers, but disapproves of their method.

"By Comcast not acknowledging that they do this at all, there's no way to report any problems with it," Topolski said.


— I've noticed this in the Bay Area and where I live I'm stuck with Comcast. It's frustrating and irritating, and to be honest it's a bit scary to think that these companies may one day control all that you see and hear on the web. I think the money used to develop these technologies could have been better spent on improving the networks and bandwidth. What say you? Article Link

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...