Comment Re:Claims like this should be legally binding (Score 1) 39
The problem with all this hype generation (and my university is up to its elbows in it, as well) is it creates an expectation with the public that all of this research is just about to pay off big, any day now. But when another couple years pass, and no practical quantum computer has been built, people will become enured to the hype and will start immediately dismissing any and all new claims they hear.
You make a good point, but I think that you're wrong and it won't matter. I don't know if you know this, but over a year ago, Sabine Hossenfelder made an interesting video on YouTube where she talked about how some people think "Winter is coming" with regards to quantum computing. What that means is that people will realize that it is very likely impossible to ever get quantum computing working where it's actually useful and funding will dry up, with only a few hardcore universities still trying to get something out of it. That hasn't happened yet. I'm shocked to s read in the original post above that Atom Computing claims to have a 1000 qbit computer working as I thought the record for most working qbits was 60-something. Most non-IT people don't understand quantum computing at all so they won't be bothered by no practical quantum computer being built. And I know that researchers believe it will take a minimum of hundreds of thousands of qbits, possibly more, working to get any kind of practical quantum computer and that may never be possible to achieve. But quantum winter has not yet come and I'm starting to wonder if it ever will. This field may have money dumped into for decades to come and never achieve anything.