I think he knows that his experimental data is crap. The note on the dirtiness of the procedures in the abstracts hints to the fact, that he put out one sample and accidentally found what could be something hyper-interesting. Out of fear of being out-published by someone else, he put out this paper, that - if this is an RT superconductor - he can (rightly) claim having discovered it (leading to wealth and nobel price). Now he can go back an do some proper experiments.

Seems more like the generation "C&C" is producing its first results. Tiberium beware!

Actually, most presentators use that as a FEATURE: The non-understanding of the basic facts caused by intentional information overload guarantees, that there are no valid refutations in the discussions phase, which makes for an easy pitch (of mostly bad ideas).

Just give it to Al Gore :-)

dare you to question the existance of the FSM!!! ;-)

That means: both have been made by intelligent designers!

Yeah, until some outsiders come around. Then you get the tyranny of the majority ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority ). Tolerance? Yes! Want to build some minarets? No. ..

Won't be that hard to accomplish. Every story is. Even 2012.

Got a hint for you :-): Two in the body, one in the head, always leaves the target dead

If you want realistic shooters, try Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six or Ghost Recon series. Weapon effects and impacts are realistic as it comes, graphics could be more state-of-the-art.

You must be new here. 1. drink vigourously 2. post on /. 3. sober up 4. ... 5. profit!

You must be new here.

How much is that in POOT (Power Output Of Togo)?