Yes it is; you're innocent until proven guilty, regardless of how much prosecutors, police, and the government don't want to believe it sometimes. If the government can't be burdened to prove that he's guilty, he's innocent.

Last I checked, Canada was a country in the North American continent. But please, take the opportunity to bring up the US for no discernible reason.

Schools in North America at least--if not everywhere in the West--seem to think that their disciplinary powers extend to any actions committed by students anywhere during their years of attendance.

In my opinion, the only time a school should have the ability to initiate disciplinary action for an act committed off school premises should be after trial and conviction of a crime. Free speech protections often don't apply in schools (don't get me started on that), but a school has absolutely no right to restrict a student's speech off school grounds, and this would be aptly enforced by requiring disciplinary sanctions for off ground behavior be the result of a conviction in a court of law. This school would get laughed at if they even mentioned prosecution of this student for this behavior to a DA, so there's no reason they should be allowed to do this.

And instead rejoiced in seeing the the editors selected non-overlapping poll options.
Hopefully no pedants complain about not having (20,21) %, (40,41) %, and so on.

We're a developer group that is now writing a server library. We plan to use it for commercial projects by putting all the code into the library and creating a thin proprietary wrapper to keep clients happy.

It's a strategic move to use the LGPL, as if we used GPL then we'd have to sell proprietary licenses. Proprietary people would choose to either:

• Re-implement their own closed-source version of the software.
• Buy a proprietary license from us and then not make the changes public.

This way (by using LGPL) we get to extract as much free source-code from them as possible.

The problem now comes with the fact that our library can be used for web services. People could make changes to our library, use them in their commercial service and not make changes public.

I was searching the net and found these links:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/731246/lgpl-for-php-applications http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/?q=node/270

The 2nd link claims you can just include an affero clause in the LGPLv3? What is your word on this?

Many thanks to the FSF. I love your work.

Bitcoins are not money.

You can fill up the gas tank in about a minute. You cant really do that with a battery pack.

That's 1 million USD split 75 ways for roughly 4 months of work.

Congratulations you're making $50/hour.

Does Strain 121 survive outside of extreme heat?

Is that a joke? How is the state government requiring businesses licensed in the state to do something like this unconstitutional?

They dont need to last for 12 hours, just long enough to make the transition to grid power.

Solar power is a perfect match for data centers. Their power demand is basically constant and they already have large batteries on site. So the main drawback of solar power isn't a problem for them (mostly).

NTFS is only writable on linux though NTFS-3G, the write support in the kernel only works if the file size doesn't change.

You'd run this in a project directory which you have built from source, try it.

That will tell you the packages for which an already build (in the current directory) depends as configured. The step of generating the ebuild is trivial from there.