Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:But Why? (Score 2) 119

I went to school back in the days of leaded gas. Precisely zero of that shit happened back then. I attribute it to societal breakdown due to economic pressures (american businessmen offshoring as much as possible, and automating the rest), effectively ending traditional stay-at-home parenting.
And also due to social pressures, (media constantly trolling for clicks with flame headlines and "analysis") combined with political extremists shouting over everyone all the time. It's the "false dichotomy" thinking that leads kids to think there are no alternatives.

Comment Re:suicide by ... (Score 1) 148

It was discussed extensively among certain progressive news sites which is where I was hanging out at the time. I hope nobody thinks the DNC is somehow liberal or left -- they aren't. Except to those who are so far to the right that everything else is left of them. And yes, I recall watergate, and the pentagon papers. Was there and alive at the time.

Comment Re:Unreal (Score 1) 114

I work in a heavy equipment/semi truck shop. The torque wrench used on the wheel lugs is cal'd every 6 months, and the details are recorded. Similar to aviation work, everything is logged. 80,000 lbs at 65 mph causes a lot of oh shit in a hurry if something isn't right. At best its just massively expensive. Cal and double checking is absolutely necessary for everyone's safety, for our company reputation, and for the insurance lawyers.

Comment Re:Software Patents (Score 1) 17

FTA: "Samuel Sparks Fisher, who became the Commissioner of Patents in 1869, pointed out that “it must soon become a serious question to determine what disposition is to be made of the models.” The next year, Congress passed new legislation, dropping the requirement for models."

Comment Re:You still need one for a perpetual motion devic (Score 2) 17

No, the USPTO will *NOT* grant a patent for a perpetual motion machine. It will be flat out rejected for lack of credibility due to involving perpetual motion (which is impossible)...

Re-read the post you replied to: "The USPTO will grant you a patent on your perpetual motion invention if you submit a working model."
If you can submit a working model, then I think you've got credibility (and have apparently discovered an error in known physics).

Also, by definition, a rejection for lacking utility would be inappropriate if the perpetual motion machine does work.

Slashdot Top Deals

No man is an island if he's on at least one mailing list.

Working...