True, but you wouldn't even need ssl with client side encryption.
You might like to look at what OpenSSL is actually used for. If you do any encryption, the odds are that you're using OpenSSL, or code derived from OpenSSL.
Those documents were compromised - by the NSA. I understand if you disagree, but I'm willing to give everyone the benefit of the doubt here and assume that Snowden didn't share the list with anyone else and The Guardian wasn't going to publish it. That means that in practical terms the British agents aren't actually at risk, and wouldn't have been at risk, although I certainly understand why the British government believes they are, and they legitimately could have been (if the British police can obtain the list from David Miranda, so can anyone else). Still, I believe their intention was to publish a story that this information had been obtained by the NSA, not publish the information itself.
Considering that the US has been, in recent years espousing the theory that cyber-attacks should be treated as real acts of war, suitable for real retaliation with real weapons, I would say it's pretty terrifying.
I wonder if it has occurred to anyone that the NSA's actions in other countries could be construed as acts of war....
actually that was a DoD initiative in 2007. now there are host-based security system clients on every computer to keep USB mass storage disabled and attempts to use it logged. doesnt help when you boot into a livecd, though.
Apple no longer makes computers that have optical drives. How long do you think it will be before the rest of the industry follows suit?
(Those who need them can of course still connect external optical drives.)
I'm being forced to learn Python.
Having a romantic breakup is a lifestyle choice (at least that's what the other poster is arguing), and you put it into the same category as mental illness.
and only gives you 10GB of data. Line rental is extra for the dial-up package as well. In terms of units better understood by the general public, that is about 8 hours of BBC iPlayer per month.
Not sure how you did that calculation. iPlayer HD is 3.6-4Mb/s, which works out at around 5-8 hours for 10GB. Standard definition content is 0.7Mb/s, which works out at just under 32 hours in 10GB.
I bet you're talking about a hackintosh
You'd lose that bet. It was one of the first-generation Core 2 MacBook Pros (I waited to replace my G4 PowerBook until they came out with 64-bit ones, because I didn't think 32-bit support in OS X would be around for much longer).
I never had any trouble with Parallels on Core 2 Duos on actual Mac hardware, ran it on 20 iMacs day in day out.
You don't mention what version you ran. They fixed it in Parallels 3.
I should also mention that the Parallels support team was amazing... a post to their forums received immediate attention.
That's the exact opposite of my experience. The ticket about the random crashing had a lot of backtraces attached but silence from Parallels support staff. It was eventually closed once they fixed the bug, with a note saying 'Fixed in Parallels 3'. The cause of the bug was that they completely failed to read the Intel docs on how IPIs work and it only worked on Core 1 as a result of an implementation detail that was explicitly not guaranteed by Intel. After reading that, even if it had been a free upgrade, I wouldn't have been inclined to trust them with code in ring 0.
Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.