Windows is my gaming system, from which I browse when I have been gaming (as I just finished a bit ago).
Linux is actually where I do most of my work already.
The chances of us wiping ourselves out before the asteroid arrives is better than the odds of the asteroid wiping us out.
Isn't that Ironic
lmao. Even the IT staff where I work, who are heavily pro-windows, MCSEs and such joke about the *reliability* of MS products. Yes, they complain about the relative complexity of setting up some things in Linux, but as of now, we are down two windows servers, replaced with one Linux server. The overall system utilization is almost twice as much, yet the system runs faster.
Yeah, I know, many will say they were doing something wrong, but they are not. MS just eats more resources and handles applications with problems far less well than Linux. The Linux machine has been running non-stop since it was put together early last year, the windows servers still need to bounce every month (which is better than the 2000s with every night). And before you blame the applications poor design, yeah its poor, but the OS is what needs to protect against that. If it can not then the OS has problems. MS just has more of those types of issues than Linux or BSD do.
You can call this whatever you want. It is just how it is.
If all else fails, lower your standards.