Why do you keep referring to Ars Technica as my "backers"?
I've no special relationship with the site's owners. I'm a member of Ars, but so are lots of people. It's true that I know a couple of people who work there, but I've not cited anything in our discussions here that's not available on the public areas of the site to anyone who cares to look, even non-members. Available even to folks like you who've had their Ars accounts banned multiple times.
And how many times do you have to be reminded that linking to a copy of the same unproven claim does not make the claim true?
Provide some actual evidence that this happened.
Since you keep going on and on about about WindowsITPro.com... Let's see what you did there...
*types "WindowsItPro Forums APK troll" into Google...*
Here's the first hit from that site:
http://windowsitpro.com/window...
The very next hit is a Slashdot story from 4 years ago in which you're caught stalking a Slashdot user named clone53421 (much as you've been stalking me):
http://slashdot.org/story/10/0...
Oh dearie me, it just gets better and better... Here you are trolling 4chan:
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog...
But I've saved the best for last. Brace yourselves for this one, which features--guess who?--none other than Jeremy Reimer saying, and I quote,
So, APK, how's that lawsuit going that you pretend to have against me? Any luck getting Shaw to cut off my internet access? How does it feel to be the laughingstock of the entire Internet?
Looks like another APK mystery has been solved.