Comment Re:Reduce gun violence? (Score 1) 436
If you believe that the semi-automatic rifles that look "dangerous" and which were banned for sale by the "assualt weapons" ban can give someone an advantage over a person who is carrying a not-as-dangerous-looking hunting rifle (for long range) or a pump-action shotgun (for close range), then take your own advice and "stop spouting off about things you don't know enough about".
Seriously, you might want to look into facts yourself before you start accusing others of not knowing what they're doing. Let's look at a standard hunting rifle, maybe something like a Remington 30-06 Sprignfield. Bolt-action, 4 round magazine, with a range of 300-400 yards. If you can engage someone from a hidden position at that range, you have the advantage. If you engage someone out in the open, in movement, at about 100 feet range, the guy with the AR-15 is going to own your ass, unless you get the kill with the first shot. Which is hard, very hard. So advantage AR-15.
Same thing for pump-action shotgun. Unless you engage the enemy at close range and out in the open, the AR-15 guy is going to own you. Which means that the AR-15 is far more flexible at providing killing options than either the 30-06 Springfield or a regular pump-action shotgun. And that's the only thing it does. It is barely ok for hunting large game or birds, and you're not going to waste that ammo on hunting vermin. So yeah, the semi-automatic long-barrel, medium-caliber rifle is good at exactly one thing: killing people at intermediate range. And that's really it. Explain to me again how that should be just widely available to everyone who asks?